- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:29:45 -0700
- To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Arg, drats, I missed the "planning" part of your email :) Sounds good to me, the only thing I would add is that I think we should remove the base-interfaces, like IDBObjectStore, and copy the relevant properties to both (async and sync) sub-interfaces. / Jonas On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > I still see the old "Request" post-fixed names when looking at > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/IndexedDB/#async-api > > Despite the top of the file saying that this is the June 10th version. > Is there somewhere else I should look? > > / Jonas > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> A while ago, we discussed some simple renaming of the IndexedDB >> interfaces. I have already closed >> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9789 >> >> as it was a very simple fix. I would like to recap the rest of the >> changes I am planning to make, just to make sure that everyone is ok >> with them: >> >> 1. Drop the "Request" prefix from our async interface names and add >> the "Sync" suffix to the sync interfaces. >> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9790 >> >> 2. Rename IDBIndexedDatabase to IDBFactory. My original proposal was >> also renaming IDBDatabase to IDBConnection but Jonas had an objection >> to that. So let's keep it IDBDatabase for now. >> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9791 >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thanks, >> Andrei >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 17:30:37 UTC