Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

Jonas, Anne, Tlyer, All,

On May 11, 2010, at 3:08 PM, ext Jonas Sicking wrote:

> Personally I would prefer to see the "UMP model" be specced as part of
> the CORS spec, mostly to avoid inevitable differences between two
> specs trying to specify the same thing. And creating an authoring
> guide specifically for the UMP security model to help authors that
> want to just use UMP.

Yes, I would also prefer that. Are there any technical reason(s) this  
can't be done?

-Art Barstow

> Specs make for bad developer documentation
> anyway.