- From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 15:36:32 -0400
- To: ext Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Jonas, Anne, Tlyer, All, On May 11, 2010, at 3:08 PM, ext Jonas Sicking wrote: > Personally I would prefer to see the "UMP model" be specced as part of > the CORS spec, mostly to avoid inevitable differences between two > specs trying to specify the same thing. And creating an authoring > guide specifically for the UMP security model to help authors that > want to just use UMP. Yes, I would also prefer that. Are there any technical reason(s) this can't be done? -Art Barstow > Specs make for bad developer documentation > anyway.
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:37:29 UTC