- From: イアンフェッティ <ifette@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:11:20 -0700
- To: marcosc@opera.com
- Cc: Gregg Tavares <gman@google.com>, Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <n2ubbeaa26f1004291511x97a36c35w6445fb0afc520d75@mail.gmail.com>
I remain perplexed by the state of "the spec is feature complete and looking for implementations" -> potential implementors saying "the spec has X,Y,Z flaws" -> "sorry, the spec is feature complete. We're looking for implementations." At this rate, it's not clear to me what implementations it's going to get. (speaking as an individual here, and not a representative of Google Inc, Google Chrome Team, or necessarily even as a member of webapps WG.) -ian Am 29. April 2010 10:38 schrieb Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Gregg Tavares <gman@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:48:52 +0200, Gregg Tavares <gman@google.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Has there been any consideration of switching the spec to a stream-able > >>> format like gzipped tar files? It seems like a shame to miss this use > >>> case. > >> > >> A streamable container, while intriguing, also has issues. For > streaming > >> to be of use, you need to specify the order of resources: the widget's > >> configuration file and start file should be the first two files in the > >> resource bundle. Are there readily available (on all major platforms) > tools > >> that do this, easily? > > > > Yes, Linux and OSX have gzip and tar. Tar puts the files in the order > given. > > > > Windows has 7zip (open source) and rar (shareware) which will make > gzipped > > tar files and also puts the files in the order given. > > Our design goal [1] was always to use the lowest common denominator > (i.e., some packaging format that was available natively on all > platforms... [un]fortunately, Zip was the only realistic option). > Having said that, there is no reason not to standardize a format as > the one Gregg is suggesting. However, this would be separate from the > current spec (which is already feature complete and looking for > implementations). > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-reqs/ > > >> > >> (Other than that, see timeless' comments about this really being too > late > >> for the current spec) > >> -- > >> Arve Bersvendsen > >> > >> Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/ > > > > > > > > -- > Marcos Caceres > Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/ > http://datadriven.com.au > >
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:11:50 UTC