- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:08:49 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9769 Summary: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: WebSimpleDB AssignedTo: nikunj.mehta@oracle.com ReportedBy: jorlow@chromium.org QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put currently takes an optional parameter "noOverwrite" But as was discussed in "[IndexedDB] Changing the default overwrite behavior of Put" [1] what we really need is a tri-state: only insert, only modify, or either. Maciej suggested we should just have 3 separate functions. This was re-iterated with Mozilla's proposal (well, 3 guys _from_ Mozilla's proposal :-) in ""[IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes" [2]. I think the current leading proposal naming wise is "add/modify/addOrModify". It's unfortunate that the common case (addOrModify) is the most verbose one, but as discussed in the second thread, it's the most clear set of names anyone's proposed so far. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/public-webapps@w3.org/msg08646.html [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/public-webapps@w3.org/msg08825.html -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:08:51 UTC