- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:08:49 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9769
Summary: IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3
methods
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebSimpleDB
AssignedTo: nikunj.mehta@oracle.com
ReportedBy: jorlow@chromium.org
QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put currently takes an optional parameter
"noOverwrite" But as was discussed in "[IndexedDB] Changing the default
overwrite behavior of Put" [1] what we really need is a tri-state: only insert,
only modify, or either. Maciej suggested we should just have 3 separate
functions. This was re-iterated with Mozilla's proposal (well, 3 guys _from_
Mozilla's proposal :-) in ""[IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes" [2].
I think the current leading proposal naming wise is "add/modify/addOrModify".
It's unfortunate that the common case (addOrModify) is the most verbose one,
but as discussed in the second thread, it's the most clear set of names
anyone's proposed so far.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/public-webapps@w3.org/msg08646.html
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/public-webapps@w3.org/msg08825.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:08:51 UTC