- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:44:45 +0100
- To: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com> wrote: > (specifically answering out of context) > > On May 17, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> 9. IDBKeyRanges are created using functions on IndexedDatabaseRequest. >> We couldn't figure out how the old API allowed you to create a range >> object without first having a range object. > > Hey Jonas, > > What was the problem in simply creating it like it is shown in examples? The API is intentionally designed that way to be able to use constants such as LEFT_BOUND and operations like only directly from the interface. > > For example, > IDBKeyRange.LEFT_BOUND; // this should evaluate to 4 > IDBKeyRange.only("a").left; // this should evaluate to "a" > But in http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/rev/fc747a407817 you added [NoInterfaceObject] to the IDBKeyRange interface. Does the above syntax still work? My understanding is that it doesn't anymore.. Thanks, Andrei
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 16:45:17 UTC