- From: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:38:12 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com>, Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTim-NMemf5AbA0U5HMSnDaSEeQyopizSJNlskuh9@mail.gmail.com>
This sounds very similar to the strategy used for WebSQLDatabase. On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > On 5/13/2010 7:51 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote: > >> > >> If you search archives you will find a discussion on versioning and that > >> we gave up on doing version management inside the browser and instead > leave > >> it to applications to do their own versioning and upgrades. > > > > Right, I'm not saying we should manage it, but I want to make sure we > don't > > end up making it very easy for apps to break themselves. For example: > > 1) Site A has two different tabs (T1 and T2) open that were loaded such > that > > one got a script (T1) with a newer indexedDB version than the other (T2). > > 2) T1 upgrades the database in a way that T2 now gets a constraint > violation > > on every operation (or some other error due to the database changing). > > > > This could easily happen any time a site changes the version number on > their > > database. As the spec is written right now, there is no way for a site > to > > know when the version changes without reopening the database since the > > version property is a sync getter, implementations would have to load it > on > > open and cache it, or come up with some way to update all open databases > > (not so fun). > > I think what we should do is to make it so that a database connection > is version specific. When you open the database connection (A) the > implementation remembers what version the database had when it was > opened. If another database connection (B) changes the version of the > database, then any requests made to connection A will fail with a > WRONG_VERSION_ERR error. > > The implementation must of course wait for any currently executing > transactions in any database connection to finish before changing the > version. > > Further the success-callback should likely receive a transaction that > locks the whole database in order to allow the success callback to > actually upgrade the database to the new version format. Not until > this transaction finishes and is committed should new connections be > allowed to be established. These new connections would see the new > database version. > > / Jonas > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:38:44 UTC