Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes

On 5/20/2010 12:19 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I additionally like the naming convention. The async interfaces is
> probably the interface that people will use first. Additionally that
> interface is available both to workers and to the main thread. So it
> makes sense to give the async interface the simpler name.
That is not how it is currently specified (and our proposal doesn't 
indicate either way).  The asynchronous versions are not available to 
worker threads.  I do recall discussion on this, however...



Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 20:35:20 UTC