Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest from Mark S. Miller on 2010-05-07 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2010)

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 18:10:19 -0700
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimUT6MLyBDqY5VY-pcx-4zryoo70C9AV5G_qZtj@mail.gmail.com>

XML is also a misnomer. And HTTP is confusing since it also works over
https.

At least we agree on Request.

On Apr 21, 2010 12:24 PM, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com> wrote:


On Apr 21, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:37:54 +0900, Mark S...
I agree that "Anonymous" or "Anon" is more clear as to the purpose than
"Uniform". I understand why UMP uses that term but I don't think it will be
obvious to authors reading code.

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Friday, 7 May 2010 01:10:51 UTC