- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:02:16 +0200
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-webapps@w3.org
Hi Yves, On Mar 29, 2010, at 16:25 , Yves Lafon wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >> Sounds good to me, although I think I would also rephrase somewhat the >> algorithm, à la: >> * the URI's scheme component is the same as scheme; and >> * if subdomains is false or if the URI's host component is not a domain >> name (as defined in RFC1034), the URI's host component is the same as >> host; or >> * if subdomains is true, the URI's host component is either the same as >> host, or is a subdomain of host (as defined in RFC1034); and >> * ... > > I didn't check if the clarifications of RFC1034 added by RFC2181 applies to your case, but it is worth checking. > (Cf: [1] and [2]). Thanks for the heads-up. I looked through RFC 2181 and I haven't seen anything concerning us that clarifies 1034. Thanks! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 10:02:47 UTC