- From: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:47:56 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, ext Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Tyler Close wrote: >> >>> Uniform-Headers = "Uniform-Headers" ":" ( "*" | #field-name ) >> >> [...] >> >>> Are Apple and/or Firefox interested in implementing the above? Does >>> mnot or other HTTP WG members consider the above a satisfactory >>> solution to ISSUE-90? >> >> I'm interested in implementing a feature along these lines if it goes into >> CORS. If it's UMP-only, then no, and I would object that it violates the >> subset relation. >> >> I am also not sure the * value is a good idea. It is tempting in its >> convenience but seems likely to cause unintended consequences. > > I agree with everything Maciej said. > > This time. Thanks for the quick response time. If this is a good feature, shouldn't the pressure be on CORS to adopt it, rather than for UMP to drop it? Otherwise, it might seem politics are overriding technical virtue. --Tyler -- "Waterken News: Capability security on the Web" http://waterken.sourceforge.net/recent.html
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 18:48:28 UTC