- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:22:45 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9789 Summary: We should use the IDB prefix on all IDB interfaces Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Indexed Database API AssignedTo: nikunj.mehta@oracle.com ReportedBy: jorlow@chromium.org QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org Andrei Popescu proposed a couple naming changes to the interfaces within IndedexDB deep within the "[IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes" thread [1]. One of them suggested we consistently use the IDB prefix on all IndexedDB interfaces. Jeremy, Shawn, and Jonas have concurred. > - I know we need to keep the "IDB" prefix in order to avoid collisions > with other APIs. I would therefore think we should keep the IDB prefix > and make sure all the interfaces start with it (right now they don't). [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/0801.html -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 16:22:46 UTC