Re: [IndexedDB] Proposal for async API changes

On 5/20/2010 9:03 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> For what it's worth, one of the ideas behind object stores, rather
> than rows+column stores, is to reduce the need for joins. I.e. in our
> candy store example you could just as well store objects like:
>
> { id: 1, name: "Adam", sales: [{candyId: 1, date: "2010-01-02"}, ...]}
Well, if people care about the size of data on disk, they will likely 
want to normalize their object stores.  We had talked about doing joins 
before in indexedDB, but I believe we decided to punt on the issue for now.

Cheers,

Shawn