- From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:02:02 -0300
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
Hi there, One of the things that I find a bit unclear in http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ , is the use of the Chrome definition. The spec says: "Chrome - The chrome comprises the visible parts of the user agent that do not depend on the content (e.g. tool bars, title bars, menus).", but from talking to people, many confuse it with "window decorations" and "desktop area", because they assume Widgets to be applications and thus not have chrome, which is what most people do not want as they strife to make the web apps look like real applications and not applications running the the browser. Personally, I think we should leave out the Chrome part from the spec and talk about window decorations and desktop area instead to make this 100% clear. As there is talk about moving the view modes to CSSOM instead, supporting chrome and none-chrome seems like something that might be needed instead. One possible solution would be to introduce a new media feature such as (application) that would turn on application mode, in contrast to browser mode. The view-mode has use-cases in the browser case, especially because a web browser can be windowed/normal, maximized and fullscreen. On the other hand, the "(view-mode: application)" feels a bit strange in the browser case, so it might need renaming. Any comments, input? -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Technical Lead / Senior Software Engineer Qt Labs Americas, Nokia Technology Institute, INdT Phone +55 81 8895 6002 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at openbossa.org http://codeposts.blogspot.com ﹆﹆﹆
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 15:02:55 UTC