- From: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:24:53 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Dmitry Titov <dimich@google.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <y2lfa2eab051004141424h7d1333bdxea1f9aa9add96058@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Good question. Let me ask you one. What value should you use for the > >> > content-type header? That value needs to contain the boundary string. > >> > You > >> > need to know that to xhr.send the data in a way that looks like a form > >> > submission. Just sending the blob will be "off by one" and the server > >> > side > >> > won't understand it. > >> > >> There seems to be general agreement (based on various discussions here > >> and on whatwg) that the .type property should be moved to the Blob > >> interface. So Blobs will have a content-type. So this problem should > >> be taken care of. > >> > >> / Jonas > > > > Yes indeed! > > So are we saying that FormData.toBlob() produces a blob representing the > > encoded > > results and having a .type property of the form... > > multipart/form-data; boundary=xxxxxxx > > In the words of Samuel L Jackson: Correctamondo > > ;) > > > [Constructor] interface FormData { Blob toBlob (); void append(DOMString > > name, Blob value); void append(DOMString name, DOMString value); }; > > Also it looks like BlobBuilder (in the draft dimich linked to) is lacking > a > > means for the caller to set the type attribute of the blob being built. > > A couple ways that could be provided... > > [Constructor] interface BlobBuilder { attribute DOMString endings; > > attribute DOMString type; // option a > > Blob getBlob (in DOMString type); // option b void append (in DOMString > > text) raises (FileException); void append (in Blob data); }; > > I don't feel strongly, but "option b" looks cleaner to me. Might want > to make the argument optional though, and default to the empty string. > Option b works for me and agreed it should be optional with empty being the default value. > > / Jonas >
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:25:22 UTC