Re: UMP / CORS: Implementor Interest

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:38:54 +0900, Jonas Sicking <> wrote:
> As I've said before. I'd be interested in implementing UMP in firefox
> if we can come  up with a reasonable API for using it. I.e. a separate
> constructor or flag or similar on XHR. This is assuming that UMP is a
> reasonable subset of CORS.

Have you looked at the proposal I put in XHR2? It sets certain flags in  
CORS that make it more or less the same as UMP. I don't really see why we  
would need UMP if we have that.

> There has been suggestions of changing header names. I'm not a big fan
> of the current names, but if we're going to fix them, i'd rather see a
> coherent strategy for all CORS headers than random spot fixes.

Does that mean you would be willing to remove support for the current  
header names? If not I'm not sure if it is worth it. But if you are I will  
make a proposal.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 01:48:15 UTC