Re: Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:07, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
>
> Note that this specifically means that a ds:Reference to the ds:Object
> element and the ds:Reference to config.xml will each require a ds:Transform
> element to specify canonicalization method.
>
> That's not true for config.xml -- that file is not referenced as with a
> same-document URI reference; therefore, it is treated as an octet-stream.

Agree with Thomas. Please treat config.xml (and all other content
files) as octet-streams. Having to do canonicalization on resources
within the widget will lead to more complexity.

Kind regards,
Marcos

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:21:35 UTC