On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > On Jun 3, 2010, at 19:29 , Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: > > Actually, I should take that back. Some of the device specs are > definitely relevant > > Right, and some of your colleagues just submitted Powerbox there, which > seems like a non-negligible chunk of work to me ;-) > > To be clear, Chrome-team is not involved in powerbox, nor is android team to the best of my knowledge. > > though I have concerns about the direction they are heading > > I regularly hear people having "concerns" about the "direction" in which > DAP specs are heading. The shame is, they never seem to want to provide any > details. > > > Either way though, it seems strange for the filesystem apis to be split. > > As I said, it's historical, and due to no one pushing strong to correct > that during chartering. Speaking personally, I don't really care much either > way. > I recall pushing strongly to correct that at TPAC in san jose. I don't think it's purely "historical". > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ > > > >
Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 16:16:39 UTC