- From: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:59:01 +0800
- To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com> wrote:
>> (specifically answering out of context)
>>
>> On May 17, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>>> 9. IDBKeyRanges are created using functions on IndexedDatabaseRequest.
>>> We couldn't figure out how the old API allowed you to create a range
>>> object without first having a range object.
>>
>> Hey Jonas,
>>
>> What was the problem in simply creating it like it is shown in examples? The API is intentionally designed that way to be able to use constants such as LEFT_BOUND and operations like only directly from the interface.
>>
>> For example,
>> IDBKeyRange.LEFT_BOUND; // this should evaluate to 4
>> IDBKeyRange.only("a").left; // this should evaluate to "a"
>>
>
> But in http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/rev/fc747a407817 you added
> [NoInterfaceObject] to the IDBKeyRange interface. Does the above
> syntax still work? My understanding is that it doesn't anymore..
You are right. I will reverse that modifier.
Nikunj
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 17:07:36 UTC