w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2004 by date

Thursday, 1 July 2004

• Extended meeting thursday? Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 30 June 2004

• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: July 1, 2004 Agenda Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Chris Ridpath
• July 1, 2004 Agenda Gregg Vanderheiden
• WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? Roberto Castaldo
• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Chris O'Kennon
• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' Jens Meiert
• [wcag2] Remarks: Examples of Guideline 4.2 Jens Meiert
• [techs] Updated HTML techniques Michael Cooper

Tuesday, 29 June 2004

• Separation of semantic and presentational markup, to the extent possible, is architecturally sound Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Flash vs Traditional Screen shot tutorials Charles McCathieNevile
• [informative] issue 707 - example 3 of guideline 3.4 (13 July expiry) Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Flash vs Traditional Screen shot tutorials Joe Clark
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Joe Clark
• scenarios for WCAG 2 design Shawn Lawton Henry
• regrets: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 30 June 2004 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Chris Ridpath
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 30 June 2004 John M Slatin
• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 30 June 2004 Michael Cooper
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Chris Ridpath
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Loretta Guarino Reid
• Reminder: Discounted hotel rate expires today Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Chris Ridpath
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Chris Ridpath
• Re: Table: Title in lieu of Caption Chris Ridpath
• Fw: "BIK BITV-Kurztest" - procedure for testing web-accessibility according German BITV/WCAG1.0 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Monday, 28 June 2004

• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Joe Clark
• Result: Poll: 2 lists or one? Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Table: Title in lieu of Caption Sailesh Panchang
• Title attribute: increase scope of use Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Table: Title in lieu of Caption Gregg Vanderheiden
• Associating text alternatives with multimedia (was: RE: Great call. Great progress on 1.1) We missed one item. John M Slatin
• Re: Action item: Bug 300- Form embedded in table Chris Ridpath
• Table: Title in lieu of Caption Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Roberto Ellero
• RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Lisa Seeman

Sunday, 27 June 2004

• RE: Great call. Great progress on 1.1 We missed one item. Gregg Vanderheiden

Saturday, 26 June 2004

• Re: Example of multiple skip links Maurizio Vittoria

Friday, 25 June 2004

• RE: Example of multiple skip links Jim Thatcher
• RE: Example of multiple skip links John M Slatin
• RE: Example of multiple skip links Joe Clark
• RE: Example of multiple skip links Jim Thatcher
• RE: Action item: Bug 300- Form embedded in table Jim Thatcher
• Re: Action item: Bug 300- Form embedded in table Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Example of multiple skip links Maurizio Boscarol
• RE: Action item: Bug 300- Form embedded in table John M Slatin
• Re: Action item: Bug 300- Form embedded in table Chris Ridpath
• Re: Great call. Great progress on 1.1 We missed one item. Joe Clark
• Re: June 24, 2004 Decisions on 1.1 Joe Clark
• RE: Example of multiple skip links Joe Clark
• RE: Example of multiple skip links Jim Thatcher
• June 24, 2004 Decisions on 1.1 Ben Caldwell
• Re: Great call. Great progress on 1.1 We missed one item. Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Action item: Bug 265: Title to differentiate linked text Sailesh Panchang
• Great call. Great progress on 1.1 We missed one item. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Action item: Bug 300- Form embedded in table Sailesh Panchang
• Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 Chris Ridpath
• Re: Table summary: technique for writing Sailesh Panchang
• metadata in images RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Table summary: technique for writing Chris Ridpath

Thursday, 24 June 2004

• [minutes] 24 June 2004 WCAG WG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Regrets: June 24, 2004 Sailesh Panchang
• End to ends with new numbers David MacDonald
• Regrets: June 24, 2004 Agenda Avi Arditti
• RE: Links lists, tabbing through links, and user agents (was [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text) John M Slatin
• Example of multiple skip links Joe Clark
• RE: [techs] Revised from Jim Thatcher Joe Clark
• Re: Links lists, tabbing through links, and user agents (was [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text) Joe Clark
• Regrets: June 24, 2004 Agenda Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [#827] Success criterion for separate content from presentation John M Slatin
• RE: Alternative Web sites Shawn Lawton Henry
• RE: June 24, 2004 Agenda ajudson
• Re: June 24, 2004 Agenda Roberto Castaldo
• Table summary: technique for writing Sailesh Panchang
• RE: June 24, 2004 Agenda Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: [techs] Revised , skipping to main content, and more Jim Thatcher
• Re: June 24, 2004 Agenda Doyle
• Re: June 24, 2004 Agenda Andi Snow-Weaver
• RE: [techs] Revised , skipping to main content, and more Lisa Seeman
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text John M Slatin
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Lisa Seeman
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Andy Heath
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text John M Slatin
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Lisa Seeman
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Andy Heath
• regrets - Re: June 24, 2004 Agenda </> Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: Alternative Web sites Richard Ishida
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Lisa Seeman
• Alternative Web sites Roberto Castaldo
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Andy Heath
• Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Lisa Seeman
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? Lisa Seeman
• suggestions on a different implementation for access keys Lisa Seeman
• RE: [#827] Success criterion for separate content from presentation Gregg Vanderheiden
• access keys Lisa Seeman
• June 24, 2004 Agenda Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 23 June 2004

• please remove <w3c-html-wg@w3.org> and<w3c-wai-pf@w3.org> from cc when replying to thread "Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>" Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Links lists, tabbing through links, and user agents (was [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text) Sailesh Panchang
• Re: [Request for comment] Minutes generated by new tool Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: [Request for comment] Minutes generated by new tool Sailesh Panchang
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [Request for comment] Minutes generated by new tool Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Sailesh Panchang
• [Request for comment] Minutes generated by new tool Wendy A Chisholm
• [minutes] 23 June 2004 WCAG WG Techniques Task Force Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Links lists, tabbing through links, and user agents (was 832 ... Addendum) John M Slatin
• Links lists, tabbing through links, and user agents (was [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text) John M Slatin
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Jens Meiert
• RE: [techs] Revised Jim Thatcher
• RE: [#655 TECH} When should link element be used to describe document navigation? Ben Caldwell
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) Mike Barta

Tuesday, 22 June 2004

• [#655 TECH} When should link element be used to describe document navigation? Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Ben Caldwell
• Regrets: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 23 June 2004 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 23 June 2004 John M Slatin
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) John M Slatin
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 23 June 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Joe Clark
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Joe Clark
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) Joe Clark
• [#246 TECH] examples of grouping links Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) John M Slatin
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Al Gilman
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Al Gilman
• Re: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplement al text Jens Meiert
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) John M Slatin
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text John M Slatin
• Re: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text david poehlman
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) Lee Roberts
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) Lisa Seeman
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Lisa Seeman
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 21 June 2004

• Re: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) Doyle

Tuesday, 22 June 2004

• RE: Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Joe Clark
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Joe Clark
• Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item]) Joe Clark
• Re: [#829] Linear reading order should be level 1 Joe Clark
• Re: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplement al text david poehlman

Monday, 21 June 2004

• RE: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplement al text Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [#831] Structural emphasis evident really a user agent issue? Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [#830] Requirement for page title should be level 2 or level 1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [#828] Definition of foreground and background Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text Al Gilman
• Re: [#831] Structural emphasis evident really a user agent issue? Al Gilman
• [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplement al text Michael Cooper
• Re: [#831] Structural emphasis evident really a user agent issue? Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• [#831] Structural emphasis evident really a user agent issue? Michael Cooper
• RE: [#829] Linear reading order should be level 1 John M Slatin
• [#830] Requirement for page title should be level 2 or level 1 Michael Cooper
• Re: [#829] Linear reading order should be level 1 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [#828] Definition of foreground and background Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• [#829] Linear reading order should be level 1 Michael Cooper
• [#828] Definition of foreground and background Michael Cooper
• [#827] Success criterion for separate content from presentation Michael Cooper
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) John M Slatin
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Jim Thatcher
• Re: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) John M Slatin
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) John M Slatin
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) John M Slatin
• Re: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) John M Slatin

Sunday, 20 June 2004

• FW: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Gregg Vanderheiden

Saturday, 19 June 2004

• Re: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: text size increasing Maurizio Boscarol
• RE: text size increasing Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Michele Diodati
• RE: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Gregg Vanderheiden
• text size increasing Maurizio Boscarol
• Re: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• GCN Daily Updates Story: Interagency committee identifies steps to citizen-centered Web site rscano@iwa-italy.org
• Highlights from 161704 Telecom Gregg Vanderheiden

Friday, 18 June 2004

• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Gregg Vanderheiden
• New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 (action item) John M Slatin
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording John M Slatin
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Chris Ridpath
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Jason White
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Lee Roberts
• 2.1 level 3 needs rewording Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 17 June 2004

• Partial regrets RE: Agenda June 17, 2004 Mike Barta
• Regrets: Agenda June 17, 2004 Avi Arditti
• RE: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Michael Cooper
• RE: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Jim Thatcher
• RE: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Jim Thatcher
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Joe Clark
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Chris Ridpath
• Partial Regrets - Re: Agenda June 17, 2004 Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques David Dorward
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: [techs] Skip navigation techniques John M Slatin
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Maurizio Boscarol
• Re: Regrets: Agenda June 17, 2004 Jason White
• Scope and exceptions in WCAG 2.0 Jason White
• Regrets: Agenda June 17, 2004 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Regrets - Re: Agenda June 17, 2004 Paul Bohman
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Wednesday, 16 June 2004

• Regrets - Re: Agenda June 17, 2004 Doyle
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Sailesh Panchang
• RE: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Jim Thatcher
• Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques Sailesh Panchang
• [techs] Skip navigation techniques Jim Thatcher
• Agenda June 17, 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Joe Clark
• RE: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Joe Clark
• [techs] Notes from techniques teleconference 16 June 2004 Michael Cooper
• [TECH] possible additional mappings from Guidelines to CSS David MacDonald
• RE: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Lisa Seeman
• RE: Are transparent backgrounds a bad idea? Lisa Seeman
• [techs] more updated mappings Ben Caldwell
• RE: Are transparent backgrounds a bad idea Richard Ishida
• Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Maurizio Boscarol
• Re: Are transparent backgrounds a bad idea Tom Croucher
• Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Tom Croucher
• Re: Are transparent backgrounds a bad idea? Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Are transparent backgrounds a bad idea? Richard Ishida
• Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout David Dorward
• Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Jens Meiert
• Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Marco Trevisan > Bazzmann|Mag
• [techs] css mapping Wendy A Chisholm

Tuesday, 15 June 2004

• Poll: 2 lists or one? Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 16 June 2004 John M Slatin
• R: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Roberto Castaldo
• [TECH] End to end 2.4 David MacDonald
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 16 June 2004 Michael Cooper
• [TECH] CSS 2.4 use numbers not names for colors David MacDonald
• RE: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Jim Thatcher
• Re: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Marco Trevisan
• Kill Blink (was RE: End to end 2.3) Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Is the word Short measurable Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Is the word Short measurable Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: question: fixed vs. liquid layout Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Is the word Short measurable Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Is the word Short measurable Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: End to end 2.3 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

Monday, 14 June 2004

• End to end 2.3 David MacDonald
• End to end 2.1, 2.2 David MacDonald
• R: Is the word Short measurable Roberto Castaldo
• RE: typo in 2.1 informative Ben Caldwell

Friday, 11 June 2004

• typo in 2.1 informative David MacDonald
• RE: Is the word Short measurable David MacDonald
• RE: Is the word Short measurable Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Is the word Short measurable David MacDonald
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Jason White

Thursday, 10 June 2004

• Registration open for 12-15 July F2F Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: 1.1 suggestion John M Slatin
• Re: FW: Agenda June 10, 2004 Paul Bohman
• RE: 1.1 suggestion John M Slatin
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Joe Clark
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Jim Thatcher
• question: fixed vs. liquid layout Maurizio Boscarol
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Jason White
• FW: Agenda June 10, 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 9 June 2004

• RE: 1.1 suggestion Cynthia Shelly
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Mike Barta
• Partial regrets RE: Agenda June 10, 2004 Mike Barta
• R: Regrets - Re: Agenda June 10, 2004 Roberto Castaldo
• Regrets - Re: Agenda June 10, 2004 Doyle
• [TECH] test image map. do we depricate redundant links David MacDonald
• Agenda June 10, 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 1.1 suggestion John M Slatin
• RE: Regrets 09/06 ajudson
• Regrets 09/06 Tom Croucher
• Re: next week's agenda (normative checklists, summary of issues) Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Making room for exceptions (was: 1.1 suggestion) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Making room for exceptions (was: 1.1 suggestion) Jason White

Tuesday, 8 June 2004

• RE: 1.1 suggestion Cynthia Shelly
• REgrets: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 09 June 2004 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 09 June 2004 Jenae Andershonis
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 09 June 2004 John M Slatin
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 09 June 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: 1.1 suggestion John M Slatin
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Gregg Vanderheiden
• Summaries for data tables Sailesh Panchang
• RE: [TECHS] Techniques Mapped To Guidelines Michael Cooper
• Making room for exceptions (was: 1.1 suggestion) Joe Clark
• RE: [TECHS] Techniques Mapped To Guidelines Michael Cooper
• RE: 1.1 suggestion John M Slatin
• Chronicle article: Left Out Online aardit@voa.gov
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Jason White

Monday, 7 June 2004

• RE: 1.1 suggestion Mike Barta
• RE: 1.1 suggestion John M Slatin
• RE: 1.1 suggestion Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: 506 definition of structure Sailesh Panchang
• RE: 1.1 suggestion John M Slatin
• RE: 3.1 - simple writing is testable... John M Slatin

Sunday, 6 June 2004

• RE: 3.1 - simple writing is testable... Lisa Seeman
• RE: the the word "short" measurable Gregg Vanderheiden

Saturday, 5 June 2004

• R: the the word "short" measurable Roberto Castaldo

Friday, 4 June 2004

• RE: 506 definition of structure John M Slatin
• FW: 506 definition of structure Gregg Vanderheiden
• next week's agenda Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 3 June 2004

• RE: 1.1 suggestion Mike Barta
• the the word "short" measurable David MacDonald

Saturday, 3 July 2004

• Regrets: Agenda - June 3, 2004 Sailesh Panchang

Thursday, 3 June 2004

• FW: optimum number of usability testing subjects John M Slatin
• Regrets - Agenda - June 3, 2004 Roberto Castaldo
• Regrets - Agenda - June 3, 2004 Roberto Ellero
• RE: Agenda - June 3, 2004 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Regrets - Re: Agenda - June 3, 2004 Doyle
• Agenda - June 3, 2004 Ben Caldwell
• Regrets - Today's Teleconference Doyle

Wednesday, 2 June 2004

• RE: [techs] Definitions of complex data tables Jim Thatcher
• [techs] mapping success criteria to techniques Ben Caldwell
• RE: [techs] Definitions of complex data tables Joe Clark
• Updated Internal WD Ben Caldwell
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 02 June 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: [techs] Definitions of complex data tables Jim Thatcher
• 506 definition of structure John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] Definitions of complex data tables John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] Definitions of complex data tables Jim Thatcher
• RE: [techs] Definitions of complex data tables Jim Thatcher
• Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 02 June 2004 Donald F. Evans
• RE: 3.1 Techniques ajudson
• Regrets Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: 3.1 Techniques ajudson
• General comment on agenda email Lisa Seeman
• 3.1 Techniques lisa seeman
• 3.1 - simple writing... Lisa Seeman
• RE: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words lisa seeman

Tuesday, 1 June 2004

• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 02 June 2004 John M Slatin
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 02 June 2004 Michael Cooper
• Re: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words Kerstin Goldsmith
• [techs] Definitions of complex data tables Sailesh Panchang

Sunday, 30 May 2004

• RE: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words Yvette P. Hoitink

Saturday, 29 May 2004

• RE: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• R: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words Roberto Castaldo
• RE: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words Jason White

Friday, 28 May 2004

• RE: Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words John M Slatin
• Proposal: Delete SC about contracted words Yvette P. Hoitink

Thursday, 27 May 2004

• RE: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 Joe Clark
• Regrets: Agenda - May 27, 2004 Roberto Ellero
• Inter-rater reliability (was definition of testability) John M Slatin
• RE: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Revised statement on testability (was" Definition of human testability) John M Slatin
• Re: Revised statement on testability (was" Definition of human testability) Joe Clark
• True text (was: Action item: [Bugzilla WCAG Issue 660] should 1.6 inlclude level 1 success criteria?) Joe Clark
• RE: [techs] The TH Rule Joe Clark
• RE: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• regrets Paul Bohman
• Re: Usability and Accessibility Joe Clark
• RE: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• RE: Action item: another example for Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• Re: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 Joe Clark
• Re: PDF tags [was: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure)] Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: Action item: another example for Guideline 3.1 Joe Clark
• Re: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 Joe Clark
• RE: Normative status of technology specific checklists Joe Clark
• Regrets: Agenda - May 27, 2004 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: PDF tags [was: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure)] John M Slatin
• RE: Link styles in use cases (was: [TECH] use cases diagrammed) John M Slatin
• RE: Action Item: Additional Examples Guideline 2.5 (user error) Joe Clark
• Re: Highlights of 5/13/-4 from Gregg Vanderheiden Joe Clark
• Structure of plain text (was: Issue 556 and 669 Joe Clark
• RE: Content in CSS Joe Clark
• PDF tags [was: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure)] Joe Clark
• Alternative for "traffic cop" (Was RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed) Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: Highlights of Telecon 5/20/2004 Joe Clark
• Link styles in use cases (was: [TECH] use cases diagrammed) Joe Clark
• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed Joe Clark
• RE: Contracted words in Hebrew Joe Clark
• Re: [techs] Definitions of complex data tables Joe Clark
• More bookmarks for topics of interest Joe Clark

Wednesday, 26 May 2004

• [TECHS] Techniques Mapped To Guidelines Chris Ridpath
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference, 19 and 26 May 2004 Michael Cooper
• [techs] Definitions of complex data tables Michael Cooper
• [tech]late regrets David MacDonald
• regrets - Re: FW: Agenda - May 27, 2004 Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• regrets Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 26 May 2004 Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• Regrets - Re: Agenda - May 27, 2004 Roberto Castaldo
• Regrets - Re: Agenda - May 27, 2004 Doyle
• Regrets Re: FW: Agenda - May 27, 2004 WATANABE Takayuki

Tuesday, 25 May 2004

• Regrets - RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 26 May 2004 Jim Thatcher
• FW: Agenda - May 27, 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed Gregg Vanderheiden
• Maybe... Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 26 May 2004 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed David MacDonald
• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed Michael Cooper
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 26 May 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 24 May 2004

• Re: [TECH] use cases diagrammed Doyle
• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed David MacDonald
• [Tech] lisa seeman

Saturday, 22 May 2004

• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed David MacDonald

Friday, 21 May 2004

• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed Gregg Vanderheiden..
• RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed David MacDonald
• Re: [TECH] use cases diagrammed Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• FW: REGRETS - Re: Agenda - May 20, 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 20 May 2004

• A Test Only - NO Need To Respond Doyle-Work
• Highlights of Telecon 5/20/2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets: Re: Agenda - May 20, 2004 - Link to more info for Agenda item 3 Sailesh Panchang
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 26 May 2004 Jenae Andershonis
• RE: Agenda - May 20, 2004 - Regrets Ben Caldwell
• Regrets Re: Agenda - May 20, 2004 WATANABE Takayuki
• RE: Agenda - May 20, 2004 - Link to more info for Agenda item 3 Gregg Vanderheiden
• [TECH] use cases diagrammed David MacDonald
• Agenda - May 20, 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 19 May 2004

• [Good read] Setting the scope for light-weight Web-based applications Wendy A Chisholm
• Mail Delivery (failure w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) wendy@w3.org
• RE: Definition of Contraction: Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: Definition of Contraction: Kerstin Goldsmith
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 19 May 2004 John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 19 May 2004 Ben Caldwell
• regrets Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 19 May 2004 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure) (long) Tom Croucher
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 19 May 2004 lisa seeman
• Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 19 May 2004 Tom Croucher
• [TECH] Additional Use cases for navigating WCAG Documents Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 19 May 2004 Michael Cooper

Tuesday, 18 May 2004

• Re: Bug 774 - Alternatives for word 'page' Sailesh Panchang
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Ben Caldwell
• read it immediately tbray@textuality.com

Monday, 17 May 2004

• Announcement: 12-15 July face-to-face meeting Wendy A Chisholm
• Action item: Short desc for guidelines/success criteria Sailesh Panchang
• Re: [SEC508] Multimedia material Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: FW: [SEC508] Multimedia material Katie Haritos-Shea
• FW: [SEC508] Multimedia material Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations lisa seeman
• RE: Definition of Contraction: lisa seeman
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 lisa seeman
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 Jason White
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Jason White
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure) Jason White
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure) Jason White
• RE: Definition of Contraction: Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 16 May 2004

• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations John M Slatin
• RE: Definition of Contraction: Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Definition of Contraction: Gregg Vanderheiden

Saturday, 15 May 2004

• Definition of Contraction: Kerstin Goldsmith
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Ben Caldwell

Friday, 14 May 2004

• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Jim Thatcher
• IRC log of ad hoc discussion of ATAG/WCAG and web apps Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Jens Meiert
• ad hoc meeting to discuss atag/wcag and web apps Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Testing definition of levels John M Slatin
• RE: Testing definition of levels Gregg Vanderheiden
• Testing definition of levels Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure) John M Slatin
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: General Usability DetecVS tor Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Content in CSS Re: Highlights of 5/13/-4 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] Acronyms and abbreviations Michael Cooper
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure) John M Slatin
• Content in CSS Re: Highlights of 5/13/-4 Charles McCathieNevile
• [wcag2] Acronyms and abbreviations Jens Meiert
• Re: General Usability DetecVS tor Maurizio Boscarol
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 Jason White

Thursday, 13 May 2004

• RE: Issue 556 and 669 Ben Caldwell
• Highlights of 5/13/-4 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Action Item: Additional Examples Guideline 2.5 (user error) Doyle-Work
• RE: Issue 556 and 669 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue 556 and 669 Andi Snow-Weaver
• RE: Normative status of techniques checklists John M Slatin
• Re: Normative status of techniques checklists Chris Ridpath
• RE: Action item: another example for Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• Re: [techs] "Rules" for data tables. Sailesh Panchang
• bug 506 & 704 and regrets re: call David MacDonald
• R: Usability and Accessibility Roberto Castaldo
• Re: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Action item: another example for Guideline 3.1 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Action Item: Additional Examples Guideline 2.5 (user error) Jason White
• RE: Action Item: Additional Examples Guideline 2.5 (user error) Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: Bug 774 - Alternatives for word 'page' Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• Re: R: Usability and Accessibility Jason White

Wednesday, 12 May 2004

• Action Item: Additional Examples Guideline 2.5 (user error) Doyle-Work
• RE: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• Re: Bug 774 - Alternatives for word 'page' Doyle-Work
• Re: Bug 774 - Alternatives for word 'page' Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Bug 774 - Alternatives for word 'page' Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Normative status of technology specific checklists Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Action item: another example for Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• RE: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• RE: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1 John M Slatin
• Re: R: Usability and Accessibility Doyle-Work
• [techs] "Rules" for data tables. Jim Thatcher
• RE: Revised statement on testability (was" Definition of human testability) John M Slatin
• RE: Bug #506 John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] The TH Rule John M Slatin
• Re: [techs] The TH Rule Sailesh Panchang
• regrets Re: Agenda - May 13, 2004 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Who benefits from Guideline 3.1 (was disambiguation) Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: Revised statement on testability (was" Definition of human te stability) Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• R: Usability and Accessibility Roberto Castaldo
• Re: Action item: [Bugzilla WCAG Issue 660] should 1.6 inlclude level 1 success criteria? Jason White
• Re: Revised statement on testability (was" Definition of human testability) Jason White
• Re: Bug 704 - Inline elements. Jason White
• Re: Normative status of techniques checklists Jason White
• RE: [techs] The TH Rule Jim Thatcher
• RE: Agenda - May 13, 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Agenda - May 13, 2004 Kerstin Goldsmith
• Agenda - May 13, 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Normative status of techniques checklists Jason White

Tuesday, 11 May 2004

• WCAG Bugzilla Upgrade FYI Ben Caldwell
• regrets Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 12 May 2004 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Action item: [Bugzilla WCAG Issue 660] should 1.6 inlclude level 1 success criteria? Joe Clark
• RE: Revised statement on testability (was" Definition of human te stability) Michael Cooper
• Re: [techs] The TH Rule Sailesh Panchang
• Re: [techs] The TH Rule Sailesh Panchang
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 12 May 2004 Michael Cooper
• Action item: [Bugzilla WCAG Issue 660] should 1.6 inlclude level 1 success criteria? John M Slatin
• Revised statement on testability (was" Definition of human testability) John M Slatin
• Re: Bug 704 - Inline elements. Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Bug 704 - Inline elements. Tom Croucher
• Re: Bug 704 - Inline elements. Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Bug 704 - Inline elements. Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Usability and Accessibility Doyle-Work
• RE: Bug 704 - Inline elements. Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: [techs] The TH Rule Bailey, Bruce
• RE: [techs] The TH Rule Jim Thatcher
• Re: Normative status of techniques checklists Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: [TECH] Summary of conversation with Kansas State U. Jason White
• Re: [techs] The TH Rule Carlos A Velasco
• RE: [TECH] Summary of conversation with Kansas State U. Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Bug #506 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets for Thursday, May 13 Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Bug 704 - Inline elements. Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [techs] The TH Rule Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [TECH] Summary of conversation with Kansas State U. Jason White

Monday, 10 May 2004

• [TECH]Diagram of Inter-relationships of WCAG Documents - first crack. David MacDonald
• Re: [techs] The TH Rule Sailesh Panchang
• RE: General Usability DetecVS tor Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: On process and how to help John M Slatin
• Re: [techs] The TH Rule Chris Ridpath
• Re: [techs] The TH Rule Carlos A Velasco
• [techs] The TH Rule Chris Ridpath
• [tech] How to do an "end to end" David MacDonald
• RE: Bug 704 - Inline elements. David MacDonald
• RE: Bug #506 David MacDonald
• RE: Bug 704 - Inline elements. Gregg Vanderheiden
• [TECH] Summary of conversation with Kansas State U. David MacDonald
• Re: General Usability DetecVS tor Maurizio Boscarol
• Bug 704 - Inline elements. David MacDonald
• RE: General Usability DetecVS tor Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: General Usability DetecVS tor Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Bug #506 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Bug #506 David MacDonald
• Re: General Usability DetecVS tor Maurizio Boscarol
• Re: General Usability DetecVS tor Gordon Montgomery
• RE: Contracted words in Hebrew Jason White
• General Usability DetecVS tor Gregg Vanderheiden
• On process and how to help Gregg Vanderheiden

Sunday, 9 May 2004

• Who benefits from Guideline 3.1 (was disambiguation) John M Slatin

Saturday, 8 May 2004

• RE: Contracted words in Hebrew John M Slatin

Friday, 7 May 2004

• RE: Contracted words in Hebrew Joe Clark
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14, 21, 28 April and 05 May 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: Contracted words in Hebrew Gregg Vanderheiden
• [TECH] Entering Checklists or Techniques from the Guidelines David MacDonald

Thursday, 6 May 2004

• Re: Contracted words in Hebrew Joe Clark
• Contracted words in Hebrew John M Slatin
• Issue 556 and 669 Tom Croucher
• difficulties with IRC Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: Issue 693 - Benefit of 2.5 (minimize error) Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Agenda May 6 th Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• Update: action items from last two weeks Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Issue 693 - Benefit of 2.5 (minimize error) John M Slatin
• Issue 693 - Benefit of 2.5 (minimize error) Yvette P. Hoitink
• Issue 774 - Replacing the Word Page Doyle-Work
• IBM Systems Journal Special Issue on Accessibility - Call for Papers Andi Snow-Weaver
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos John M Slatin
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos David MacDonald
• RE: wording for 1.1 RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos John M Slatin
• RE: wording for 1.1 RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos John M Slatin
• Proposed examples for Guideline 3.1 (mostly level 3) John M Slatin
• scripts authoring question lisa@ubaccess.com
• wording for 1.1 RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Jonathan O'Donnell

Wednesday, 5 May 2004

• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos John M Slatin
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Gregg Vanderheiden
• Aggregators Re: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos John M Slatin
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Donald F. Evans
• Regrets: Agenda May 6 th Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Regrets: Agenda May 6 th Roberto Castaldo
• Agenda May 6 th Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [TECH]cont'd Traffic Cop Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 4 May 2004

• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 May 2004 John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 May 2004 Jenae Andershonis
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 May 2004 Michael Cooper
• [TECH]cont'd Traffic Cop David MacDonald
• [TECH]Traffic Cop Gateway Prototype for Integration of Techniques Documents David MacDonald
• RE: Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Kynn Bartlett
• R: Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Roberto Castaldo
• RE: Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• Re: Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)

Monday, 3 May 2004

• Re: [OT] RE: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Avi Arditti
• [OT] RE: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Richard Ishida
• Re: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Kynn Bartlett
• Price of WCAG attendance in Big Macs (Was RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter) Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Avi Arditti
• RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Avi Arditti
• RE: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Richard Ishida
• RE: Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April John M Slatin
• Re: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Avi Arditti
• RE: Definition of human testability John M Slatin
• RE: Epilepsy Links Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Definition of human testability Gregg Vanderheiden
• Example: Real-time feed of satellite photos John M Slatin
• RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: Definition of human testability John M Slatin
• RE: Epilepsy Links Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: Definition of human testability Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Definition of human testability John M Slatin
• R: Definition of human testability Roberto Castaldo
• RE: Definition of human testability Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Definition of human testability John M Slatin
• RE: Suggestion for this Editorial Note John M Slatin
• RE: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April John M Slatin
• RE: Definition of human testability Gregg Vanderheiden

Sunday, 2 May 2004

• RE: Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Suggestion for this Editorial Note Charles McCathieNevile
• Disambiguation Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Suggestion for this Editorial Note Doyle
• RE: Suggestion for this Editorial Note Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: Verified issues - week of 26 April Joe Clark
• RE: Suggestion for this Editorial Note Joe Clark
• RE: Suggestion for this Editorial Note Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Definition of human testability Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Definition of human testability Gregg Vanderheiden
• FW: Suggestion for this Editorial Note Gregg Vanderheiden

Saturday, 1 May 2004

• RE: Definition of human testability Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposed guideline: Allow users to control the rendering of the content Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 30 April 2004

• Verified issues - week of 26 April Wendy A Chisholm
• Issues that need discussion or proposals - week of 26 April Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Proposed guideline: Allow users to control the rendering of the content Joe Clark
• Issue 681 - Mousekeys and keyboard support Wendy A Chisholm
• Proposed guideline: Allow users to control the rendering of the content. Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Absolute/Relative Sizes Michael Cooper
• Absolute/Relative Sizes Chris Ridpath
• Re: Highlights from April 29th Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Highlights from April 29th John M Slatin
• FW: Docs for reference to comfortable to reach - easy to read. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Linking from guidelines to techniques Jens Meiert
• REGRETS - Re: Agenda April 29th Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)

Thursday, 29 April 2004

• Highlights from April 29th Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Issue 707 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Issue 707 Mike Barta
• Re: Linking from guidelines to techniques Joe Clark
• RE: "You call that a standard?" Joe Clark
• Re: "You call that a standard?" and Charter Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: "You call that a standard?" and Charter Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: "You call that a standard?" and Charter Yvette P. Hoitink
• "You call that a standard?" and Charter Joe Clark
• REGRETS - Re: Agenda April 29th Doyle Burnett
• Regrets: Apr 29 meet Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Updated charter for today's discussion Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Definition of human testability John M Slatin
• Re: Linking from guidelines to techniques Wendy A Chisholm
• Linking from guidelines to techniques Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Definition of human testability Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Definition of human testability Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Agenda April 29th: Level 1 Success Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• Definition of human testability Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Agenda April 29th: Level 1 Success Criteria Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Agenda April 29th: Level 1 Success Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• Issue #330: Proposed wording for 3.1 L1SC2 and L2 SC 2 and 3 John M Slatin
• RE: Agenda April 29th: Level 1 Success Criteria Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Agenda April 29th: Level 1 Success Criteria John M Slatin
• Regrets / comments Re: Agenda April 29th Charles McCathieNevile
• Agenda April 29th Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 28 April 2004

• [techs] gateway technique for guideline 2.4 Tom Croucher
• Re: Apr 29 meet Matt May
• Apr 29 meet Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Reopened issues - week of 19 April 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Reopened issues - week of 19 April 2004 John M Slatin
• RE: Reopened issues - week of 19 April 2004 Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Reopened issues - week of 19 April 2004 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Reopened issues - week of 19 April 2004 John M Slatin
• Regrets: 28/04 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: [Tech] 1.3 analysis lisa seeman
• Epilepsy Links Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Regrets: 28/04 John M Slatin
• regrets lisa seeman
• regrets Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 April 2004 Charles McCathieNevile
• Regrets: 28/04 Tom Croucher
• RE: Reopened issues - week of 19 April 2004 Jason White

Tuesday, 27 April 2004

• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 April 2004 Michael Cooper
• RE: Reopened issues - week of 19 April 2004 John M Slatin
• Reopened issues - week of 19 April 2004 Wendy A Chisholm
• Closed and verified issues - week of 19 April Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 26 April 2004

• The subject of my last email is "End to End analysis of Guideline 1.4 & 1.5" David MacDonald
• [Tech] David MacDonald
• Guideline 2.4: Level 1 criterion Sailesh Panchang
• RE: [tech] information architecture for interweiving WCAG documents Richard Ishida

Friday, 23 April 2004

• QA Process Document template Joe Clark
• Re: [tech] information architecture for interweiving WCAG documents Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [tech] information architecture for interweiving WCAG documents Wendy A Chisholm
• [tech] information architecture for interweiving WCAG documents David MacDonald
• Re: javascript accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: javascript accessibility Tom Croucher
• Re: javascript accessibility Jens Meiert
• late regrets Kerstin Goldsmith

Thursday, 22 April 2004

• Regrets: Agenda April 22th Roberto Castaldo
• Regrets: April 22nd Avi Arditti
• Regrets: RE: Agenda April 22th Yvette P. Hoitink
• Regrets: Agenda April 22th WATANABE Takayuki
• Re: javascript accessibility Tom Croucher
• Regrets: Agenda April 22th Roberto Ellero
• Re: Agenda April 22th - Regrets for today Andi Snow-Weaver
• Regrets: Agenda April 22th Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Agenda April 22th Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: javascript accessibility Jens Meiert
• Regrets / comments Re: Agenda April 22th Charles McCathieNevile
• javascript accessibility Maurizio Boscarol
• RE: 'End to End' Proposal Tom Croucher
• RE: 'End to End' Proposal Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Agenda April 22th Joe Clark
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables Joe Clark
• Re: [Issue 317] Color Joe Clark

Wednesday, 21 April 2004

• [Accessible XUL authoring guidelines v1] Jason White
• 'End to End' Proposal Tom Croucher
• Re: [Issue 317] Color Doyle Burnett
• RE: [Issue 317] Color John M Slatin
• Re: Agenda April 22th Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Agenda April 22th Doyle Burnett
• Re: [Issue 317] Color Doyle Burnett
• RE: Agenda April 22th John M Slatin
• RE: [Issue 317] Color John M Slatin
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables John M Slatin
• Re: [Issue 317] Color Joe Clark
• Re: Agenda April 22th Joe Clark
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 April 2004 John M Slatin
• RE: Agenda April 22th John M Slatin
• Agenda April 22th Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 20 April 2004

• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 April 2004 Michael Cooper
• Proposal: Technical and usable accessibility differentiation, accessibility heuristics Jens Meiert

Monday, 19 April 2004

• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables Jim Thatcher
• Re: Schedule for WCAG 2? Wendy A Chisholm
• Issues that need discussion or proposals - week of 12 April Wendy A Chisholm
• Closed and verified issues - week of 12 April Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Validity Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Maurizio Boscarol
• Schedule for WCAG 2? Yvette P. Hoitink
• Validity Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables John M Slatin
• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Jens Meiert
• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Maurizio Boscarol
• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Jens Meiert
• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Maurizio Boscarol
• Re: R: [wcag2] Layout tables Jens Meiert
• R: [wcag2] Layout tables Roberto Castaldo
• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Jens Meiert
• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Maurizio Boscarol
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables lisa seeman
• RE: [Issue 317] Color lisa seeman
• [Issue 317] Color Gregg Vanderheiden

Sunday, 18 April 2004

• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables oedipus@hicom.net
• Re: [Issue 317] Color Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• [Issue 317] Color Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables lisa seeman

Saturday, 17 April 2004

• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Maurizio Boscarol
• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Gregory J. Rosmaita

Friday, 16 April 2004

• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables Mike Barta
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables Joe Clark
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: [wcag2] Layout tables Michael Cooper
• Re: [wcag2] Layout tables Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Level definition Sailesh Panchang
• [wcag2] Layout tables Jens Meiert
• Re: Agenda times? Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 15 April 2004

• Agenda times? Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• Re: 2 or 3 Levels Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: 2 or 3 Levels Gregg Vanderheiden
• Scoping and Logo Gregg Vanderheiden
• LEvel definition Gregg Vanderheiden
• Different categories of level 3 guidelines Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: 2 or 3 Levels Matt May
• conformance notes from a reviewer Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: REGRETS - Agenda April 15th doyleb@alaska.net
• 2 or 3 Levels Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 14 April 2004

• Re: [#656] explicit numbering for nested lists Joe Clark
• DRC recommendations on WCAG (was: W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Statement on Web Access) Joe Clark
• Re: Agenda April 15th Joe Clark
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 14 April 2004 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Issues and questions: mapping guidelines and success criteria to techniques and tests Chris Ridpath
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 14 April 2004 lisa seeman
• Regrets and comments Re: Agenda April 15th Charles McCathieNevile
• Agenda April 15th Gregg Vanderheiden
• W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Statement on Web Access Report from UK Disability Rights Commission Judy Brewer
• Proposal for Conformance Scoping Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 13 April 2004

• RE: [#656] explicit numbering for nested lists Gregg Vanderheiden
• [#656] explicit numbering for nested lists Michael Cooper
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 14 April 2004 John M Slatin
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 14 April 2004 Michael Cooper
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 07 April 2004 Michael Cooper

Monday, 12 April 2004

• Issues and questions: mapping guidelines and success criteria to techniques and tests Wendy A Chisholm
• Compliance Extra Level Chris Ridpath

Friday, 9 April 2004

• RE: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• Happy Easter Roberto Castaldo

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• WCAG Theme song on Danish National Broadcasting David MacDonald
• Regrets - Late and so Sorry - Sick Doyle
• RE: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Ben Caldwell
• RE: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Chris Ridpath
• RE: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Joe Clark
• RE: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Joe Clark
• RE: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Marja-Riitta Koivunen

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

• Re: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Doyle Burnett
• RE: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) John M Slatin
• RE: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) John M Slatin
• D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal) Joe Clark
• Dutch interview: use of screen readers and frequency of updates Yvette P. Hoitink
• New Bug Tracking Procedure Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 April 2004 John M Slatin
• LEvel definition Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Conformance Testing Proposal Donald F. Evans
• Regrets: RE: Agenda April 8th Yvette P. Hoitink
• Agenda April 8th: regrets Roberto Castaldo
• [techs] 04 April 2004 WD of Gateway to Techniques for WCAG 2.0 Wendy A Chisholm
• Agenda April 8th Gregg Vanderheiden
• area+alt RE: Conformance Testing Proposal (and...) Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 6 April 2004

• RE: Conformance Testing Proposal David MacDonald
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 April 2004 Michael Cooper
• Making conformance claims in metadata Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Conformance Testing Proposal (and area+alt) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: area+alt (was: Conformance Testing Proposal) Jason White
• area+alt (was: Conformance Testing Proposal) Joe Clark

Monday, 5 April 2004

• RE: Conformance Testing Proposal John M Slatin
• Re: Conformance Testing Proposal Chris Ridpath
• RE: Conformance Testing Proposal David Dorward
• RE: Conformance Testing Proposal John M Slatin
• RE: Conformance Testing Proposal John M Slatin
• Re: Conformance Testing Proposal Doyle Burnett
• Re: Conformance Testing Proposal David Dorward
• RE: Conformance Testing Proposal John M Slatin
• Conformance Testing Proposal Chris Ridpath
• Re: A Dyslexic Perspective on e-Content Accessibility Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Sunday, 4 April 2004

• RE: A Dyslexic Perspective on e-Content Accessibility lisa seeman

Friday, 2 April 2004

• Re: [techs] Techniques Submission Form Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [techs] Techniques Submission Form Chris Ridpath
• Apologies Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• [techs] Techniques Submission Form Ben Caldwell
• Regrets: agenda 4-1-04 Roberto Castaldo
• A Dyslexic Perspective on e-Content Accessibility Lisa Seeman
• Regrets: agenda 4-1-04 Roberto Ellero
• web authoring for people with learning disabilities Lisa Seeman
• RE: [techs] help file lisa seeman
• Meta data lisa seeman
• Regrets: agenda 4-1-04 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 22:53:11 UTC