- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:28:12 -0500
- To: "Jim Thatcher" <jim@jimthatcher.com>, "Cynthia Shelly" <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, "Web Content Guidelines" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
It's true that sighted users can ignore images that don't interest them, and that it's harder to ignore unwanted text. Hence skipnav links, etc. But good information and page design and good markup can help-- using a header tag to identify the description, for example. And screen readers provide tools that help users skip over some things-- keystorkes that let you jump to another element, for example. I don't think it's a perfect solution, and I wouldn't want to say it's appropriate in every place. But there are times when it would help. As I said previously, I'm not wedded to this idea. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM! Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter http://mail.giantcompany.com -----Original Message----- From: Jim Thatcher [mailto:jim@jimthatcher.com] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:53 AM To: John M Slatin; 'Cynthia Shelly'; 'Gregg Vanderheiden'; jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au; 'Web Content Guidelines' Subject: RE: 1.1 suggestion John Slatin wrote: > But some sites and some users might benefit from designs that provide > the > descriptions without requiring an extra keypress or an additional > decision. Even suggesting this will, in my opinion, result in gems like the va.gov site used to be (http://jimthatcher.com/whatnot.htm) and the way http://archives.gov is today. Long long descriptions attached to invisible gifs that you must listen to; maybe they should attach skip links at the top of each description so you can skip to the next long descripiton (kidding). And then John said, > Sighted users get the images without having to *do* > anything other than bring up the page. Why should a user who's blind, > or a user who has trouble processing complex visual material, have to > do extra work to get equivalent content? True John, but sighted users can and usually do ignore the images without doing anything. If descriptions are added inline they cannot be ignored with speech and I am surprsed you don't find that hugely important. Jim Accessibility, What Not to do: http://jimthatcher.com/whatnot.htm. Web Accessibility Tutorial: http://jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm. (Nothing here Joe!)
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 15:29:55 UTC