- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 23:46:54 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <auto-000031609312@spamarrest.com>
In discussions on our last call "usability" came up since it was a question from one of our reviewers How do we separate "Accessibility / Usability problems that are specific to disabilities" From "usability issues that are faced by all users" One test I have sometimes found useful in examining this question is "Does it multiply the time and effort for people with disabilities by the same amount as people without disabilities?" If the multiplier is the same - then it may be a general usability issue. For example Good page 2 min for no disability Good page 4 min for screen reader user Bad page 3 min for no disability Bad page 6 min for screen reader user This bad page appears to be 50% harder for both groups. This looks more like a general usability problem rather than accessibility since it slows everyone down by the same factor Another example Good page 2 min for no disability Good page 4 min with screen reader Page 2 - 3 min for no disability Page 2 - 10 min with screen reader. Page 3 - 3 min for no disability Page 3 - cannot get at some of the information with screen reader. These look like accessibility problems Page 2 is much more than proportionately harder (250% vs 50%) Page 3 is inaccessible Just passing along in case it is of use to others in thinking about the problem Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 00:47:16 UTC