- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:04:34 +1000
- To: "John M Slatin" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Cc: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
John M Slatin writes: > > I think we could add an SVG example without implying that all graphics > have to be SVG to conform-- though we might have to say that out loud:-) I agree. More general I think we should clarify somewhere that examples given in a definition or in the guidelines are meant to be informative, not normative, and we could say by way of illustration that the example of vector-based graphics under guideline 1.3 should not be interpreted as precluding the use of raster-based images in appropriate circumstances. I would also raise the question of whether we need a section entitled "how to interpret these guidelines".
Received on Sunday, 16 May 2004 21:17:48 UTC