- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:58:43 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Two level definitions to start discussion Thursday #1 - Is from our current doc #2 - is one that John sent in recently as part of "easier to understand" work Others are invited - please post to the list -------------- #1 -from our current doc Level 1 success criteria: 1- do not specify how information is presented 2- are reasonably applicable to all websites 3- some are machine-testable. Others require human judgment. Success criteria that require human testing yield consistent results among multiple testers. Level 2 success criteria: 1- may require an author to present content in particular ways 2- are reasonably applicable to all websites 3- some are machine-testable. Others require human judgment. Success criteria that require human testing yield consistent results among multiple testers. Level 3 success criteria: 1- are additional criteria that go beyond Level 1 and 2 that may be applied to make sites accessible to more people with all or particular types of disability ---------------- #2 -one that John sent in recently as part of "easier to understand" work Level 1 success criteria 1. Do not set limits on content or presentation; 2. achieve a minimum level of accessibility through markup, scripting, or other technologies that interact with user agents, including assistive technologies; 3. may reasonably be applied to all Web resources; 4. are testable. some success criteria are machine-testable. Others require human judgment. Success criteria that require human testing are capable of yielding consistent results among multiple testers. Level 2 success criteria 1. Build on Level 1; 2. enhance accessibility through presentation; 3. may reasonably be applied to all Web resources; 4. are testable. some success criteria are machine-testable. Others require human judgment. Success criteria that require human testing are capable of yielding consistent results among multiple testers. Level 3 success criteria 1. May provide essential benefits for users with specific disabilities; 2. may enhance accessibility for a broad range of users with disabilities; 3. may affect content as well as presentation and markup; 4. may reasonably be applicable to selected resources; 5. are testable. some success criteria are machine-testable. Others require human judgment. Success criteria that require human testing are capable of yielding consistent results among multiple testers. Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 10:00:19 UTC