- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:31:29 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: >3. Conformance > > - consensus about whether or not all of the 3rd group > need to be met to claim 3rd category of conformance? I am opposed to any model of conformance where you can claim "some/most of a group of requirements" as opposed to a clear list (potentially with either/or alternatives. Otherwise comparing conformance claims becomes meaningless, and trying to use them to determine whether a particular person can expect the content to work for them is also likely to break down. > - what do we want to call the 3 levels of conformance > - should we coord w/EO > - is the naming more of a marketing than technical issue?) I think their name is absolutely a marketing issue and we should hand it off to EO if at all possible. cheers Chaals
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2004 07:32:07 UTC