- From: Jim Thatcher <jim@jimthatcher.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:57:23 -0500
- To: "'David Dorward'" <david@us-lot.org>, "'WAI GL (E-mail)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
David Dorward: > I believe (can anyone confirm) that the two big ones, IBM Homepage > Reader and JAWS, are both aural layers on top of MS Internet Explorer > and thus will support id based fragment identifiers. Actually, the two "big ones" would be Window-Eyes by GW Micro and JAWS for Windows by Freedom Scientific. IBM Home Page reader is a talking browser, not a scren reader. And yes, all three depend on IE for Web access. Jim Accessibility, What Not to do: http://jimthatcher.com/whatnot.htm. Web Accessibility Tutorial: http://jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm. -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Dorward Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:57 AM To: WAI GL (E-mail) Subject: Re: [techs] Skip navigation techniques On 17 Jun 2004, at 14:51, Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote: > > <div id="notizie"><h2>Notizie</h2>... > > is good for XHTML 1.1 Also for HTML 4.x > but this could cause problems about backward compatibility. The only browser that I know, off the top of my head, which does not recognise element ids as fragment identifiers is Netscape 4. > (and we need to check with the screen readers) I believe (can anyone confirm) that the two big ones, IBM Homepage Reader and JAWS, are both aural layers on top of MS Internet Explorer and thus will support id based fragment identifiers. -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/> <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2004 13:58:27 UTC