- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 11:00:24 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <auto-000036017065@spamarrest.com>
No We are saying that L2 items would do one or the other or both. So an SC that only does one (either one) would fit. - as would one that does both Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sailesh Panchang Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 11:04 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Testing definition of levels <Definition of Level 2 agreed upon yesterday> LEVEL 2 SUCCESS CRITERIA 1. Increases accessibility either through either or both of the following a) additional facilitation of user agent based accessibility b) content and/or presentation that provides direct accessibility without requiring the user or their user agent to do anything different from users without disabilities </Definition of Level 2 agreed upon yesterday> Now read: <Level 2 SC 1 for Guideline 1.3> Information presented using color is also available without color and without having to interpret markup (for example through context or text coding). </Level 2 SC 1 for Guideline 1.3> My question: The Level 2 SC 1 for Guideline 1.3 explicitly excludes mark-up as a method of achieving accessibility. So this violates the definition of level 2 as it permits (a) or (b) or both. Right? Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Fax: 703-225-0387 * Look up <http://www.deque.com> *
Received on Friday, 14 May 2004 12:00:39 UTC