- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:42:28 +0200
- To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Ok!now i'm on train... Poor connection, so i check this night.
As told Castaldo, we need to set no number of seconds (hard to measure) but ideas about what we want as success criteria.
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "Gregg Vanderheiden"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Inviato: 15/06/04 7.29.38
A: "'Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)'"<rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable
Nice Roberto, Very nice,
I propose we use this instead of what we have. Please look at it and
comment.
1. Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the background
sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content with
the exception of occasional sound effects. </proposed>
ALSO - I think that we should combine this one (which only has one - level 3
success criteria) with the previous guideline. So think about this too.
Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
-----Original Message-----
From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) [mailto:rscano@iwa-italy.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:09 AM
To: gv@trace.wisc.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Is the word Short measurable
<proposed>
1. Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the
background
sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content
with
the exception of occasional sound effects. </proposed>
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "Gregg Vanderheiden"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Inviato: 15/06/04 6.50.16
A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable
I agree
Any wordsmiths that can figure out how?
Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf
Of Roberto Castaldo
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:02 AM
To: 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: R: Is the word Short measurable
The problem is that we should be able to creare a SC so that no
particular
kind of media is left out.
I think we should find the way not to specify fixed numbers, but I
realize
it's almost impossible if we want to keep the SC testable; also the 20
db
threshold is a fixed number, but in that particular case, I feel that
it's a
reasonable compromise.
Best regards,
Roberto Castaldo
-----------------------------------
www.Webaccessibile.Org coordinator
IWA/HWG Member
rcastaldo@webaccessibile.org
r.castaldo@iol.it
Mobile 348 3700161
Icq 178709294
-----------------------------------
________________________________
Da: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] Per
conto
di Gregg Vanderheiden
Inviato: venerd́ 11 giugno 2004 22.22
A: 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable
Better
But I think this would still eliminate all war films.
It is level 3 but…
I wonder if we can figure a way to get what we want without catching so
much
else that it would be ok to leave out.
Gregg
[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 01:46:10 UTC