- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:42:28 +0200
- To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Ok!now i'm on train... Poor connection, so i check this night. As told Castaldo, we need to set no number of seconds (hard to measure) but ideas about what we want as success criteria. ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Gregg Vanderheiden"<gv@trace.wisc.edu> Inviato: 15/06/04 7.29.38 A: "'Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)'"<rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable Nice Roberto, Very nice, I propose we use this instead of what we have. Please look at it and comment. 1. Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the background sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content with the exception of occasional sound effects. </proposed> ALSO - I think that we should combine this one (which only has one - level 3 success criteria) with the previous guideline. So think about this too. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) [mailto:rscano@iwa-italy.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:09 AM To: gv@trace.wisc.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: Is the word Short measurable <proposed> 1. Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the background sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content with the exception of occasional sound effects. </proposed> ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Gregg Vanderheiden"<gv@trace.wisc.edu> Inviato: 15/06/04 6.50.16 A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable I agree Any wordsmiths that can figure out how? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roberto Castaldo Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:02 AM To: 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: R: Is the word Short measurable The problem is that we should be able to creare a SC so that no particular kind of media is left out. I think we should find the way not to specify fixed numbers, but I realize it's almost impossible if we want to keep the SC testable; also the 20 db threshold is a fixed number, but in that particular case, I feel that it's a reasonable compromise. Best regards, Roberto Castaldo ----------------------------------- www.Webaccessibile.Org coordinator IWA/HWG Member rcastaldo@webaccessibile.org r.castaldo@iol.it Mobile 348 3700161 Icq 178709294 ----------------------------------- ________________________________ Da: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] Per conto di Gregg Vanderheiden Inviato: venerd́ 11 giugno 2004 22.22 A: 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable Better But I think this would still eliminate all war films. It is level 3 but… I wonder if we can figure a way to get what we want without catching so much else that it would be ok to leave out. Gregg [Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 01:46:10 UTC