Re: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal)

I think we can all agree that the d-link has got to go. It's an ugly kludge
that was used because the longdesc was not supported.

It currently does serve a purpose but, with the longdesc getting more
support, it's becomming useless.

Do we dump it now or wait another year or two?

If kept for a short while, would it be a priority 3?

Chris

Received on Thursday, 8 April 2004 09:27:31 UTC