- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:22:26 -0500 (CDT)
- To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> > Enforcing a prohibition on top posting does not > > lead to more comprehension. > > There are many who disagree with you (hi Joe). People who don't understand E-mail, maybe. Ignoramuses and arrivistes, in other words. Do they count? Answers don't come after questions; we already saw the original posting; there are *twenty* years of experience of threaded electronic discussions using interleaved replies; and, to be frank, people who top-post are lazy-arse bastards with crappy mail programs. Why cater to them? Clearer now? > Have you seen research to back your claim? How about the fact that proponents of top-posting can never muster anything other than "I like it," "My software does it automatically" ("until user agents"?), or "People need it" as justifications. People *don't* need it. And there's an enormous range of documentation proving why top-posting is harmful. <http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?TrimYourPosts>: Trim Your Posts <http://www.xerez.demon.co.uk/usenet.htm>: Usenet Newsgroups <http://www.redballoon.net/~snorwood/quote-rant.shtml>: Annoying quoting practices rant <http://www.enabling.org/ia/celiac/netiquett.html#TRIM>: Email Netiquette Guidance <http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post>: All My FAQs Wiki: How to post <http://www.amk.ca/conceit/mailing-list.html>: A Look at a Mailing List <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html>: Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>: Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting <http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccaughan/g/remarks/uquote.html>: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions If your screen reader can't voice quoted text correctly, get it fixed. ("Until user agents"?) Even Eudora can enunciate quoted text in a different voice. And the format=flowed spec, which, by curious coincidence, I wrote the FAQ for, adds even further structure. <http://joeclark.org/ffaq.html> It's insane to suggest that learning-disabled persons can understand answers that come before questions. How's that gonna work again? -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 18:22:31 UTC