- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:06:34 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Why don't refer to viewpoint instead of frames and new windows, like in uaag 1.0? ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Mike Barta"<mikba@microsoft.com> Inviato: 29/04/04 22.25.52 A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Oggetto: Issue 707 Gl3.2 example3: frames that do not track history making the back button behave unexpectedly. Issue requests clarity on the purpose and recommendation of the example. The issue that is being raised is that if a frame is navigated without adding to history then the users back button will not go back to the prior page, but rather to the last page that was entered into history. Outside of clarity the current phrasing is quite HTML centric. Propose: Example 3: preserve navigational history If UA supports navigaional history content author should not alter the history nor should they prevent the current page from being added to the history collection as these actions would make navigation unpredictable. [Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 18:07:13 UTC