- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:04:47 +0100
- To: "'Tom Croucher'" <tom.croucher@sunderland.ac.uk>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Tom, Imagine that you want your graphic to appear round in shape. Then imagine that you want to allow the graphic to move across a background image applied to the page itself as the window is flexed. Or imagine that you provide alternate stylesheets with different coloured backgrounds. The way you'd normally do this is to make the 'corners' of your graphic invisible. That's what I'm talking about. (Yes, for you experts out there, I know I need to think carefully about anti-aliasing if this is going to work ;) Hope that helps, RI ============ Richard Ishida W3C contact info: http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ W3C Internationalization: http://www.w3.org/International/ > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tom Croucher > Sent: 16 June 2004 13:45 > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Subject: Re: Are transparent backgrounds a bad idea > > > Hi Richard, > > I can't quite follow the logic of using a transparent > background, if it truly is a background then the need for > transparency wouldn't be necessary. > If some complex layered affect is going to be achieved then > that is probably more of an issue than the transparency. > > My feeling is that avoiding transparency is preferable, > although if the user is using a custom style sheet it will > likely disable whatever background you were using anyway. > > Regards, > > -- > Tom Croucher > Human Computer Systems Group, University of Sunderland / > Codeworks NITRO http://www.codeworksnitro.net >
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2004 09:04:47 UTC