- From: Roberto Castaldo <r.castaldo@iol.it>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:43:00 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I think "short sound" may mean so many things... maybe we could try and explain what we're thinking about: do we mean "impulsive sounds"? If so we'd better use the word "impulsive", as it is quite self-explaining. My best regards, Roberto Castaldo ----------------------------------- www.Webaccessibile.Org coordinator IWA/HWG Member rcastaldo@webaccessibile.org r.castaldo@iol.it Mobile 348 3700161 Icq 178709294 ----------------------------------- ________________________________ Da: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] Per conto di David MacDonald Inviato: giovedì 3 giugno 2004 22.30 A: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Oggetto: the the word "short" measurable Level 3 Success Criteria for Guideline 1.5 1. Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the background sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content with the exception of occasional short sounds. [V] Do we need to give a definition of “short” in Guideline 1.5 Level 3? --------------------------------------------- …Access empowers people... …barriers disable them… www.eramp.com <http://www.eramp.com/>
Received on Saturday, 5 June 2004 06:45:34 UTC