- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:47:09 -0500
- To: "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joe Clark Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 1:13 pm To: WAI-GL Subject: Re: Links lists, tabbing through links, and user agents (was [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental text) > Joe Clark has asserted [1] that the links list is a "proprietary" > feature of the JAWS screen reader, and therefore should not factor > into the Working Group's consideration of requirements for link text. I asserted that exactly one software application that the Working Group favours had that feature, so the Working Group wants it imposed everywhere. It's grand that other software does it, too-- but it is absurd in the extreme to *force authors to write pages that make sense in the authors' intended reading order and when remixed by some machine*. OK, I'll bite. What would you say is the "intended reading order" of http://www.cnn.com? What is the "intended reading order" of http://www.utexas.edu? Or of http://www.metmuseum.org/Works_of_Art/viewHigh.asp?dep=17&viewmode=0? And how does one determine the "intended reading order"? With this message, I start using my new buzzword in earnest: Why does the Working Group hate the Web? -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:47:13 UTC