- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:47:09 -0500
- To: "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Joe Clark
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 1:13 pm
To: WAI-GL
Subject: Re: Links lists, tabbing through links, and user agents (was
[#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of supplemental
text)
> Joe Clark has asserted [1] that the links list is a "proprietary"
> feature of the JAWS screen reader, and therefore should not factor
> into the Working Group's consideration of requirements for link text.
I asserted that exactly one software application that the Working Group
favours had that feature, so the Working Group wants it imposed
everywhere. It's grand that other software does it, too-- but it is
absurd
in the extreme to *force authors to write pages that make sense in the
authors' intended reading order and when remixed by some machine*.
OK, I'll bite. What would you say is the "intended reading order" of
http://www.cnn.com? What is the "intended reading order" of
http://www.utexas.edu? Or of
http://www.metmuseum.org/Works_of_Art/viewHigh.asp?dep=17&viewmode=0?
And how does one determine the "intended reading order"?
With this message, I start using my new buzzword in earnest: Why does
the Working Group hate the Web?
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 14:47:13 UTC