- From: Jim Thatcher <jim@jimthatcher.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:31:55 -0500
- To: "'Marco Trevisan'" <info@bazzmann.it>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: "'W3C WAI'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Marco, > In this case a large part of users found the new version more readable and > better usable than the old one. Which is new and which is old? http://www.bazzmann.com/standard/ is what you call flexible, right? And this, http://www.bazzmann.com/, is fixed. But I don't now which is new. Which one was more readable and easier to use? I hope the flexible one, http://www.bazzmann.com/standard/, but am not sure. jim Accessibility, What Not to do: http://jimthatcher.com/whatnot.htm. Web Accessibility Tutorial: http://jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm.
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 14:33:42 UTC