- From: Doyle Burnett <dburnett@sesa.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:57:30 -0800
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, W3C Web Content <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 4/28/04 9:26 PM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: > > Time: 2100 UTC (4 PM US Eastern) > Number: +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224 > irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag > > Agenda for this week > > 1. Action items > > 2. Conformance > > - Do all items at all 3 levels needed to be testable? [1] > > - Do we want to have advisory items that are not testable in the > guidelines doc? > > - Working definition of the criteria for placing items in each of the > three levels [2] > > - consensus about whether or not all of the 3rd group > need to be met to claim 3rd category of conformance? > > - what do we want to call the 3 levels of conformance > - should we coord w/EO > - is the naming more of a marketing than technical issue?) > > 3. open issues, > - Color - Issue 317 > <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=317> > > Gregg > > > > [1] Current Proposal > Success criteria for all levels would be testable. Some success criteria > may be machine-testable. Others may require human judgment. Success > criteria that require human testing would, in the judgment of the working > group members, yield consistent results among multiple knowledgeable > testers. > > > [2] Latest proposal - based on John's submission and working group > discussion - but does not yet reflect our decisions regarding scope - so > will need discussion and editing. > > LEVEL 1 SUCCESS CRITERIA > > 1. Do not set limits on content or presentation; > > 2. Achieve a minimum level of accessibility through markup, > scripting, or other technologies that interact with user agents, > including assistive technologies; > > 3. The working group felt could be reasonably be applied to all Web > resources; > > > LEVEL 2 SUCCESS CRITERIA > > 1. Build on Level 1; > > 2. Increase accessibility both though additional facilitation of user > agent based > accessibility and through content and/or presentation that provides > direct > accessibility without requiring intervention by user agents or > assistive technology; > > 3. The working group felt could be reasonably be applied to all Web > resources; > > > LEVEL 3 SUCCESS CRITERIA > > 1. Go beyond Level 1 and 2 to increase direct and user agent enhanced > accessibility > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 14:57:58 UTC