- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 13:07:12 -0500
- To: "David Dorward" <david@us-lot.org>, "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Thanks, David. A very helpful commentary on a really sad situation. David's analysis makes it clear that there's a significant problem with the way graphical user agents handle image maps when images are turned off. But Chris' proposal that we require redundant text links for image maps (whether server- or client-side) *for now* seems like bringing the dread "until user agents" clauses back in through the back door even though we've tried hard to keep them out of the guidelines themselves. If Chris was proposing a candidate for a technology-specific checklist with a built-in mandate for change as user agents change, then the checklist shouldn't be normative (because adding new requirements would trigger the whole W3C process). But if the checklists aren't normative then they aren't reliable bases for conformance claims. <wringing of hands> Is there an argument to be made that redundant text links for image map areas provide an accessibility benefit, e.g., for users with learning disabilities? If so, I would find that a more convincing rationale than the argument that user agents don't behave properly. But I would be concerned about the impact of such a requirement where there are large image maps with a considerable number of selectable areas-- for example, a map of Europe or the United States. John "Good design is accessible design." Please note our new name and URL! John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Dorward Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:38 pm To: WAI WCAG List Subject: RE: Conformance Testing Proposal On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 17:38, John M Slatin wrote: > > As far as I know, most graphical browsers still have problems > > representing image maps when images are disabled, even when suitable > > alt text is present. > Interesting, David. What kind of problems? The "entirely unusable" kind of problems. http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/mapalt.html#gr-fail -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Monday, 5 April 2004 14:07:18 UTC