- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:12:31 -0500 (CDT)
- To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> David's analysis makes it clear that there's a significant problem with > the way graphical user agents handle image maps when images are turned > off. An edge case that will need to be fixed. No doubt it will be. We are, after all, documenting the problem in this very thread (also elsewhere). > But Chris' proposal that we require redundant text links for image > maps (whether server- or client-side) *for now* seems like bringing the > dread "until user agents" clauses back in through the back door even > though we've tried hard to keep them out of the guidelines themselves. Indeed it does, and should thus be rejected wholesale. area+alt has been part of the spec since 1999. <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.html#adef-alt> WCAG 2.0 won't be ready until 2005. Authors won't have to conform right then and there. That will have given user-agent makers six full years to comply with one easy part of the HTML spec. I don't see why we should be appeasing nonstandard user agents or any of their creators who can't be bothered to follow the spec. > -----Original Message----- Nice. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Monday, 5 April 2004 21:12:26 UTC