RE: 3.1 Techniques

Sorry, should have said in previous posting... We now have a demo area of
the concept coding approach @

http://134.36.34.102:8080/ccf/at-frameset.jsp - this is not actually parsing
an alternative rdf concept coded representation of content (since we don't
have the api ready yet). But it does provide an example of the what the rdf
might look like and how it can be used. (It is however talking to our rdf
ontologies). We're literally finishing this funding block of the project in
the next few weeks but we're already working on getting more to carry this
work further. We also hope to get an api working soon. Will let you know
more later.


For more general info on our approach see: http://134.36.34.102/ccf/

Andy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ajudson [mailto:ajudson@computing.dundee.ac.uk] 
> Sent: 02 June 2004 11:05
> To: 'lisa seeman'; 'WAI GL (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: 3.1 Techniques
> 
> 
> 
> I'm with Lisa on this one & agree with your comments about 
> simple language.
> My understanding of why its not higher up the priority ladder is the
> automatic testability requirement (and the target readership 
> of the actual
> site), though I may be wrong.
> 
> Lisa, if you need help on the rdf techniques document then 
> give us a shout,
> as you know this is right up our street.
> 
> There was an a thread on the wai-ig list not long ago about the use of
> symbols, incase u missed it:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2004AprJun/0250.html
> 
> Andy.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lisa seeman [mailto:seeman@netvision.net.il] 
> > Sent: 02 June 2004 10:23
> > To: 'John M Slatin'; 'WAI GL (E-mail)'
> > Subject: 3.1 Techniques
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Re: Making it possible to convert text into symbolic 
> languages such as
> > those used by Augmentative and Alternative Communication 
> > (AAC) devices. 
> > 
> > I noticed the following editorial note
> > Editorial Note: js: say how-through metadata? And we need an 
> > example for
> > this one, under examples. Clearly a Level 3
> > 
> > Please note we have concrete example in the RDF (resource 
> description
> > framework) techniques document.
> > 
> > With 3.1 being meta data and RDF intensive, do we need the RDF
> > techniques on the critical list for WCAG 2.0 release?
> > 
> > If so I should probably start working on it again...
> > 
> > 
> > All the best
> > Lisa Seeman
> >  
> > Visit us at the UB Access website
> > UB Access - Moving internet accessibility
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
>

Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2004 06:13:42 UTC