- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 22:25:08 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Forwarding DOyles 'regrets' note -----Original Message----- From: Doyle-Work [mailto:dburnett@sesa.org] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 10:40 AM To: Gregg Vanderheiden Subject: REGRETS - Re: Agenda - May 20, 2004 On 5/19/04 8:26 PM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: > > > Time: 2100 UTC (4 PM US Eastern) > Number: +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224 > irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag > > > 1. proposed wording for guideline 1.3, success criteria 1 (Issues 556 and > 669) > Tom's proposal: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0302.html> > > 2. proposal to move Guideline 2.4, level 2 item 1 to level 1. (Issue 780) > Sailesh's proposal: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0157.html> > > 3. Clarification of the definition of structure (Issue 506) > david's proposal: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0316.html> > > 4. inline warnings and user agent features: (Issue 704) > David's proposal: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0320.html> > > 5. example 3 doesn't make a recommendation - seems like a UA problem (Issue > 707) > Mike's proposal: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0203.html> > > 6. contracted words? (Issue 776) > John's proposal: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0303.html> > > 7. benefits and examples for 3.2 - success feedback and identification of > context changes (Issues 492 and 496) > Greg Gay's response: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2004May/0002.htm > l> > > > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2004 23:25:11 UTC