- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:02:03 -0500
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C46A1118E0262B47BD5C202DA2490D1A0183AF11@MAIL02.austin.utexas.edu>
I agree. "Good design is accessible design." Please note our new name and URL! John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ <http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/> -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 12:36 pm To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: Definition of human testability Yes That is what is intended I believe. Your alternative wording #1 is closest. The word "certain" isn't quite right since it would apply to all of the non-machine testable items so it would become 1. In the judgment of the working group members, the success criteria that are not machine testable can be tested by humans in a manner that is capable of yielding consistent results among multiple knowledgeable testers. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sailesh Panchang Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 11:22 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Definition of human testability Present draft: "Success criteria for all levels would be testable. Some success criteria may be machine-testable. Others may require human judgment. Success criteria that require human testing would, in the judgment of the working group members, yield consistent results among multiple knowledgeable testers." Comment: Wording of the last sentence is confusing. I believe what is meant is: "Judgment of the working group members" applies to identification of criteria that can be tested with consistency and reliability by humans. Right? Do we intend to list these tests? Consider following alternatives: 1. In the judgment of the working group members, certain success criteria can be tested by humans in a manner that is capable of yielding consistent results among multiple knowledgeable testers. 2. Claims of conformance to success criteria can be based on human testing is such testing has yielded or is capable of yielding consistent results among multiple knowledgeable testers. Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Fax: 703-225-0387 * Look up <http://www.deque.com> *
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 14:02:08 UTC