- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:37:49 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I was assigned the color checkpoints to work on cleanup They currently read: LEVEL 1: Success Criteria for Guideline 1.3 Any information presented through color is also available without color (for example through context or markup or coding that does not depend on color). @@issue 317? Note: Color must be interpretable by a user agent so that the user doesn't have to look at markup to determine meaning. LEVEL 2: Success Criteria for Guideline 1.3 Information presented using color is also available without color and without having to interpret markup (for example through context or text coding). @@issue 317 [V] ISSUES - it is not clear what is meant by code. It is supposed to mean that you mark the materials in a visual fashion that can be viewed without needed special user agent or feature. But coding sounds a lot like markup. - level 1 should allow markup as solution. Then level 2 would go further and make it directly accessible. POTENTIAL REWORDING LEVEL 1: Success Criteria for Guideline 1.3 Any information presented through color is also available without color (for example through markup or context or characters or symbols that accompany the color coding) [I] Note: If markup is used, markup must be interpretable by a user agent so that the user doesn't have to look at markup to determine meaning. LEVEL 2: Success Criteria for Guideline 1.3 Information presented using color is also available without color and without having to interpret markup (for example through context or or characters or symbols that accompany the color coding). [V] Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2004 01:38:41 UTC