- From: Michael Cooper <michaelc@watchfire.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 17:01:43 -0400
- To: 'Gregg Vanderheiden' <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, 'Doyle' <doyleb@alaska.net>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 17:00:05 UTC
Our current thinking is that the "traffic cop" is a new independent document. The document currently called Gateway to Techniques is tentatively renamed "Technology-Independent Techniques". Instead of being between the Success Criteria and the technology-dependent techniques documents (as a "Gateway" between guidelines and techniques), it would exist at the same level as the other techniques documents, but heavily referenced from those documents. The "traffic cop" is a central place to tie things together so we don't have to deal with everything linking to everything, and it expands and replaces that part of the role that we previously thought the Gateway to Techniques to could fill. The discussion has been taking place with a context coming out of the Wednesday calls and not yet clearly explained on the list. I hope my explanation helps to clarify, not muddy, things for those who haven't been on the Wednesday calls. Michael -----Original Message----- From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 3:26 PM To: 'Doyle'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: [TECH] use cases diagrammed The question wasn't 'why do we need the cop/locator' but rather - how does this change the role of the techniques gateway?
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 17:00:05 UTC