- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:07:29 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In all these discussions, we should keep in mind that when we are saying that it is not good for accessibility etc we are talking in relative terms. I think it is better to say "it is more accessible if...." unless we are talking about an absolute access problem (not even perceivable). Having to use the horizontal scroll bar to read something is not an absolute bar -- but it can be pretty close for people with very low vision unless they have proper tools that will realign them to the beginning of the next line. However if we design our pages correctly this could be done. However if you add a second column of text, it is much harder for the tool and the person to figure out what is going on. Try setting your window width down to one forth of the screen. Now look through a soda straw and use that vision with horizontal scrolling and tackle some sites. Maybe not absolutely inaccessible but largely unusable.... and therefore largely inaccessible. SO - back to what is good or better. I won't say what is 'good enough' but I suggest that better is - pages that can be rendered linearly by user agents (regular or special) - pages that allow text to be easily resized (and change font face so a good stroke width can be used if authors like to use a thin letter.) - pages that allow text to reflow. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison
Received on Saturday, 19 June 2004 10:07:43 UTC