Friday, 29 September 2000
- Custom DTDs on the W3C Validator (was: Published DTDs)
- RE: Published DTDs
- Published DTDs
- RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding*
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding*
- Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding*
Thursday, 28 September 2000
- [Fwd: NEW: VocalCommerce.com Newsletter]
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- media: AbleTV.net's montly town hall meeting . . .
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Re: off topic at a tangent(formally Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- RE: Comments from WiseWomen Mailing List on Textual Graphics
- RE: off topic at a tangent(formally Commercial Realities and Ac cessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- Re: off topic at a tangent(formally Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- RE: off topic at a tangent(formally Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- RE: Olympics.com (was: Re: apology on "alt" tags)
- RE: Olympics.com (was: Re: apology on "alt" tags)
- RE: apology on "alt" tags
- off topic at a tangent(formally Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
Wednesday, 27 September 2000
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Comments from WiseWomen Mailing List on Textual Graphics
- RE: Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- RE: Olympics.com (was: Re: apology on "alt" tags)
- RE: Olympics.com (was: Re: apology on "alt" tags)
- RE: Olympics.com (was: Re: apology on "alt" tags)
- Olympics.com (was: Re: apology on "alt" tags)
- Porche Boxter or Luxury Cruise Earn $$$ In Days This Works!!!
- RE: apology on "alt" tags
- Re: Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- Re: apology on "alt" tags
Tuesday, 26 September 2000
- Clarifying malicious
- Re: apology on "alt" tags
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: apology on "alt" tags
- RE: Commercial Realities and Accessibility
- Re: Commercial Realities and Accessibility
- Re: apology on "alt" tags
- RE: Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text butto ns level 2 compliant)
- RE: Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- RE: Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant)
- RE: Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text butto ns level 2 compliant)
- apology on "alt" tags
- RE: Accessibility of this font to people with varying disabilitie s
- Re: Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text butto ns level 2 compliant)
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Accessibility of this font to people with varying disabilities
- Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text butto ns level 2 compliant)
- Re: Accessibility of this font to people with varying disabilities
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Accessibility of this font to people with varying disabilities
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- [media] Does the ADA Apply to the Web?
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
Monday, 25 September 2000
Friday, 22 September 2000
Thursday, 21 September 2000
- Fwd: The $2M Alt Tag
- Home Loan Rates as Low as 6.5%
- Re: aural CSS
- aural CSS
- RE: Windows 2K, slightly off-topic
- RE: Windows 2K, slightly off-topic
- Windows 2K, slightly off-topic
- media: AbleTV.net's coverage of the President's Digital Divide . . .
Wednesday, 20 September 2000
- So, How in the heck have you been?
- Re: WAI Home: page redesign
- Search Functionality (was: WAI Home: page redesign)
- WAI Home: page redesign
- Quick feedback requested on draft WAI home page redesign
Tuesday, 19 September 2000
Monday, 18 September 2000
Saturday, 16 September 2000
- WAI Mentioned in MSN Explorer
- Re: Unsubcribe
- Re: Unsubcribe
- Re: Increased Accessibility using Adobe Capture 3.0 for pdf files
Thursday, 14 September 2000
- RE: ssl and lynx_w32?
- RE: ssl and lynx_w32?
- RE: ssl and lynx_w32?
- RE: ssl and lynx_w32?
- RE: ssl and lynx_w32?
- RE: ssl and lynx_w32?
- Symbols and literacy, 2 Grants in the UK
Wednesday, 13 September 2000
Tuesday, 12 September 2000
- HWG Co-Sponsors Accessibility Symposium
- Fwd: November Assistive Technology Conference
- SuSE Linux 7.0 suitable for partially sighted and blind people
Monday, 11 September 2000
- Increased Accessibility using Adobe Capture 3.0 for pdf files
- Re: comments/suggestions/criticisims please
- comments/suggestions/criticisims please
Sunday, 10 September 2000
- Call for Papers: New international journal UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY
- Re: (linux)netscape 4.7 & Crashes
- (linux)netscape 4.7 & Crashes
Saturday, 9 September 2000
Friday, 8 September 2000
- working with Real G2 producer files . . .
- media: Able Kids Club Story Hour . . .
- An Excerpt From the NBA Tape Recording Manual now online
- A question about some disability issues
Thursday, 7 September 2000
- New Home for htmldesigners Mailing List
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- RE: Bobby blows whistle...
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- Call for Review: Accessibility Features of SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- RE: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- Re: [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- [media] Bobby blows whistle on inaccessible Web pages
- Advice needed ALT text PA stateparks
- RE: conference
- RE: conference
Wednesday, 6 September 2000
- RE: conference
- RE: conference:[Fwd: Web Developer Fall Conference 2000 * Sept. 1 8 * San Francisco]
- AWARE Center Update Feedback
- RE: conference:[Fwd: Web Developer Fall Conference 2000 * Sept. 1 8 * San Francisco]
- RE: conference:[Fwd: Web Developer Fall Conference 2000 * Sept. 1 8 * San Francisco]
- Off topic
- RE: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- RE: off topic?
- conference:[Fwd: Web Developer Fall Conference 2000 * Sept. 18 * San Francisco]
- Re: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
Tuesday, 5 September 2000
- RE: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- Re: Cookies
- Cookies
- Fwd: Follow Up: Open Source for the Visually Impaired
- RE: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- Re: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- RE: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- RE: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- Re: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- Re: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- Mac/IE/XHTML Problem
- AOL
- News: NYTimes Article on Online Deliveries
- Re: off topic?
- Reader's guide to Olympics accessibility decision
Monday, 4 September 2000
- FREE GAMES
- mobile phones & book references
- off topic?
- This list not accessible from WebTV (was: DISCARD, from MsgrBen@w ebtv.net)
- Re: reading vs. writing
Sunday, 3 September 2000
- Re: reading vs. writing
- DISCARD
- Re: reading vs. writing
- Re: reading vs. writing
- Re: reading vs. writing
- Re: Fw: Thank you!
- Re: Fw: Thank you!
Saturday, 2 September 2000
Sunday, 3 September 2000
Saturday, 2 September 2000
- Re: media: Cyber Senator Unveils Senate's First Web Site for DisabledInternet Users
- media: Cyber Senator Unveils Senate's First Web Site for DisabledInternet Users
- Re: reading vs. writing [2]
- reading vs. writing [2]
- Re: reading vs. writing
- Re: reading vs. writing
- reading vs. writing
- Re: Fw: Thank you!
Friday, 1 September 2000
Thursday, 31 August 2000
- FW: Quest. on Adobe PDF to HTML converter
- Re: Quest. on Adobe PDF to HTML converter
- Quest. on Adobe PDF to HTML converter
- experimental website - italian language
- Upcoming Submission Deadline, CHI2001
- Web Site accessibility stats
- [Fwd: NEW: AccessFP List]
Wednesday, 30 August 2000
- Open Source vs. Proprietary: can you spell Betamax?
- FlowerFunds - Fund Raising Program
- RE: Converter Agent
- Entertainment
Tuesday, 29 August 2000
Monday, 28 August 2000
- Re: Question out of ignorance
- Progress report for User Agent Guidelines Working Group
- Bloody rude: apologies due
- Re: Question out of ignorance
- Question out of ignorance
- Olympics.com ordered to comply to access guidelines
- Media, ZDNet: Olympic site must race for blind accessibility
- RE: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- RE: Converter Agent
- Re: Converter Agent
- RE: Converter Agent
- Re: Converter Agent
- Converter Agent
Sunday, 27 August 2000
- laser printer toner cartridges
- Re: No usability testing available then? was tears now seems to be spilt milk
- No usability testing available then? was tears now seems to be spilt milk
- Re: Gobsmacked was: Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Re: Tears & Usability was: Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Re: Gobsmacked was: Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Tears & Usability was: Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Re: Gobsmacked was: Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Adobe prepares accessible PDF reader
Saturday, 26 August 2000
- Back to the W3C Home page (was: Logical Linearized Order on a Page)
- Elevator Speeches for Web Sites (was: Logical Linearized Order on a Page)
- Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Re: Gobsmacked was: Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- please forgive:[Fwd: The case of the disappearing cursor: who remembers AccessDos?]
- Gobsmacked was: Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- RE: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
Friday, 25 August 2000
- Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Re: Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- Logical Linearized Order on a Page
- RE: New W3C Site Design
- Re: New W3C Site Design
- RE: New W3C Site Design
- Please keep on topic, and do not cross-post [was: Re: Copyright Infringement]
- New W3C Site Design
- Copyright Infringement
- Re: Open Source software for people with visual disabilities
- Re: How to escalate a false AAA rating report
Thursday, 24 August 2000
Wednesday, 23 August 2000
Tuesday, 22 August 2000
- Re: [WAI] Netscape 6.0
- [WAI] Netscape 6.0
- Re: How to escalate a false AAA rating report
- How to escalate a false AAA rating report
- NEW WEB SITE!
Sunday, 20 August 2000
Friday, 18 August 2000
Thursday, 17 August 2000
- Re: DHTML menus and accessibility
- Re: DHTML menus and accessibility
- Rather Sad: http://www.dems2000.com/adainformation.html
- Valign in the Table cell using CSS
Wednesday, 16 August 2000
Tuesday, 15 August 2000
- RE: DHTML menus and accessibility
- DHTML menus and accessibility
- announce:[Fwd: Online chat session (8/15): Accessibility Support in the Java 2Platform]
Monday, 14 August 2000
- Re: screen readers, browsers,
- RE: PDF
- Re: PDF
- RE: PDF
- RE: PDF
- Re: PDF
- Re: PDF
- Re: PDF
- AbleTV.net at the DNC . . .
- Antigen found =*.txt file
- Antigen found =*.txt file
- Documentation Specialist Seeking Contract Work
Saturday, 12 August 2000
- Do You want to earn $3000-$4000 or more per month?
- Re: content guidelines checkpoint 4.1
- Re: content guidelines checkpoint 4.1
- Re: content guidelines checkpoint 4.1
- ON LINE: Program RI Brazil/Programa RI Brasil
Friday, 11 August 2000
- Final Reminder: Please Review Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
- content guidelines checkpoint 4.1
- Surfing The Web With Your Eyes Closed
- Upcoming WAI face-to-face meetings
Thursday, 10 August 2000
Wednesday, 9 August 2000
- Re: Netscape 6
- RE: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
- [w3c-wai-ig] <none>
- Re: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
- Media, ZDNet: Olympics Web site riddled with blind spots
- RE: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
Tuesday, 8 August 2000
- RE: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- Re: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- Re: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- IID Dialog-Program/ Dialogo IID-Programa
- RE: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
- Re: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- Re: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- RE: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- RE: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
- RE: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- RE: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- Re: "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- "invisible" alternate links: accessible?
- RE: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
- RE: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
- Thank you very much!
- Call for Review: Accessibility Features of SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)
- RE: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
- Re: content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
Monday, 7 August 2000
- content guidelines checkpoint 3.1
- RE: Accessible Image Map Examples
- RE: PC World Article on Web Accessibility
- RE: PC World Article on Web Accessibility
- RE: PC World Article on Web Accessibility
- Re: PC World Article on Web Accessibility
- Reminder: Please Review Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
- PC World Article on Web Accessibility
- Re: Alternative to PDF
- Re: Netscape 6
- RE: Netscape 6
- RE: Netscape 6
- Re: Netscape 6
- Re: Netscape 6
- Netscape 6
Friday, 4 August 2000
- Re: [Fwd: Misconception?]
- Alternative to PDF
- RE: [Fwd: Misconception?]
- Accessible Image Map Examples
Thursday, 3 August 2000
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- [Fwd: Misconception?]
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- [Fwd: Barrier-free web design workshop online 09/04]
- Re: element to accessability mapping?
Wednesday, 2 August 2000
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- element to accessability mapping?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- Re: WinWAP 3.0 PRO - WAP Browser for Windows
Tuesday, 1 August 2000
- Re: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- Please Ignore last post Re: August 1 Minutes (fwd)
- RE: PDF Alternatives?
- August 1 Minutes (fwd)
- PDF Alternatives?
- formatting forms and using fieldset and legend
- Review of W3C Speech Interface Framework
- [Fwd: [webwatch] Fw: Emerging Technology: TextAloud MP3]
Monday, 31 July 2000
- eLearn to Design Information
- eLearn to Design Information
- Internet Based Teaching - August 15, 2000
- RE: Front Page again
- RE: Seeking comments on this site
- Re: Front Page again
- RE: Front Page again
- Front Page again
- News Flash
Sunday, 30 July 2000
Saturday, 29 July 2000
Sunday, 30 July 2000
Saturday, 29 July 2000
Friday, 28 July 2000
- use of hotspots and relative units
- RE: Please review: Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Gui delines 1.0
Thursday, 27 July 2000
- Please review: Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
- Re: Do you dare......
- Re: Federal Website Accessibility Deadline
- Federal Website Accessibility Deadline
- RE: [press release] NEW ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS ADOPTED FOR (CO NNECTICUT) STATE WEB SITE
- AOL Accessibility Policy
- Re: Do You Dare......
- AOL settles
- Do you dare......
- Re: Do You Dare......
- Re: Do You Dare......
- Re: Parodox
- Parodox
Wednesday, 26 July 2000
- RE: AOL Case Settles
- Re: AOL Case Settles
- Re: [press release] NEW ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS ADOPTED FOR (CONNECTICUT) STATE WEB SITE
- Seeking comments on this site
- Re: [press release] NEW ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS ADOPTED FOR (CONNECTICUT) STATE WEB SITE
- Do You Dare......
- [press release] NEW ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS ADOPTED FOR (CONNECTICUT) STATE WEB SITE
- AOL Case Settles
- Career Opportunities
- Re: What is the propper procedure?
- Re: QUESTION: Redacted testimony
Tuesday, 25 July 2000
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- Somewhat Off Topic: New W3C Homepage Design
- Re: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- Re: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- Re: QUESTION: Redacted testimony
- Fwd: Nasa just approved pdf
- Fwd: Linux.com Newsletter - Linux Better for the Blind?
- Re: QUESTION: Redacted testimony
- Re: QUESTION: Redacted testimony
- Re: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
Monday, 24 July 2000
- Re: QUESTION: Redacted testimony
- Re: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: State laws regarding web accessibility
- RE: h1, h2, etc.
- RE: h1, h2, etc.
- Re: h1, h2, etc.
- ADA torch relay press release . . .
Sunday, 23 July 2000
Saturday, 22 July 2000
Friday, 21 July 2000
- Re: appropriate hypertext
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- Re: appropriate hypertext
- RE: verifying accessibility
- Re: Accessibility Features in SVG - Image Scaling
- Re: maps and alternate content
- [w3c-wai-ig] <none>
Thursday, 20 July 2000
- RE: verifying accessibility
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- Re: maps and alternate content
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: appropriate hypertext
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: maps and alternate content
- Re: maps and alternate content
- RE: appropriate hypertext
- (repost) Upcoming Online Course on Web Accessibility
- Re: maps and alternate content
- Re: QUESTION: Redacted testimony
Wednesday, 19 July 2000
- Re: maps and alternate content
- Re: Personalised interfaces (was Re: appropriate hypertext)
- Re: appropriate hypertext
- Re: verifying accessibility
- RE: verifying accessibility
- RE: appropriate hypertext
- Re: Personalised interfaces (was Re: appropriate hypertext)
- maps and alternate content
- documenting the description and role of a background image
- Re: Personalised interfaces (was Re: appropriate hypertext)
- Re: Moving on...
- Moving on...
- RE: verifying accessibility
- Re: appropriate hypertext
- Re: verifying accessibility
- RE: verifying accessibility
- Re: verifying accessibility
- RE: verifying accessibility
- Re: appropriate hypertext
- RE: appropriate hypertext
- Re: appropriate hypertext
- Personalised interfaces (was Re: appropriate hypertext)
- RE: State laws regarding web accessibility
- RE: appropriate hypertext
- State laws regarding web accessibility
- RE: appropriate hypertext
- RE: NOW: appropriate hypertext
- Re: appropriate hypertext
- RE: appropriate hypertext
- RE: verifying accessibility
- Re: NOW: appropriate hypertext
- Re: appropriate hypertext
- NOW: appropriate hypertext
- QUESTION: Redacted testimony
- Re: Accessibility of the White House site
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: verifying accessibility
- RE: PDF Question
- RE: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- Display Notification: Re: verifying accessibility
- Web content, and access
- Re: verifying accessibility
Tuesday, 18 July 2000
- Re: verifying accessibility
- Accessibility Evaluation of http://data.ole.net/ada/
- Re: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- Re: verifying accessibility
- Re: How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- RE: verifying accessibility
- Re: verifying accessibility
- How do I use CSS to fake a button?
- Re: HTML+ based on-screen keyboard?
- Re: PDF Question
- Re: verifying accessibility
- Re: verifying accessibility
- PDF Question
- RE: verifying accessibility
- RE: verifying accessibility
- Re: verifying accessibility
- verifying accessibility
- RE: HTML+ based on-screen keyboard?
- RE: layers
- RE: Nesting headers
- layers
- RE: HTML+ based on-screen keyboard?
- Re: HTML+ based on-screen keyboard?
- Website on accessibility
- HTML+ based on-screen keyboard?
Monday, 17 July 2000
- Presentation Notes: Blueprint for Single-A Compliance
- Accessibility of the White House site
- accessibility of usworkforce.org [was "bobby approved?"]
- Accessibility Features in SVG - Image Scaling
Sunday, 16 July 2000
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
- Re: quirie?[Fwd: RE: Problems With RealPlayer Embedded in Web Pages]
- Re: quirie?[Fwd: RE: Problems With RealPlayer Embedded in Web Pages]
- Re: quirie?[Fwd: RE: Problems With RealPlayer Embedded in Web Pages]
- Re: quirie?[Fwd: RE: Problems With RealPlayer Embedded in Web Pages]
Saturday, 15 July 2000
- Re: quirie?[Fwd: RE: Problems With RealPlayer Embedded in Web Pages]
- Re:%20fyi&In-Reply-To=<B1E68D292F3CD111A57C0000F67CB3CAA37DD6@WDCSRV03.usmint.tr
- quirie?[Fwd: RE: Problems With RealPlayer Embedded in Web Pages]
- Re: bobby approved
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
Friday, 14 July 2000
- Re: bobby approved
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
- 6th ERCIM Workshop on "USER INTERFACES FOR ALL"
- Book announcement
- Re: SVG Replacing HTML Could be Accessibility Disaster
- SVG Replacing HTML Could be Accessibility Disaster
Thursday, 13 July 2000
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
- RE: Accessibility barrier?
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
- Re: mouse target size
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
- accessibility barrier.
- Re: Accessibility barrier?
- Accessibility barrier?
- Re: alt tags - a moot point?
- Re: mouse target size
- mouse target size
- Re: [ Re: alt tags - a moot point? ] ; xml + accessibility-agents?
- [ Re: alt tags - a moot point? ] ; xml + accessibility-agents?
- Re: alt tags - a moot point?
- alt tags - a moot point?
Wednesday, 12 July 2000
- media:[Fwd: [htmldesigners] (Fwd) Fw: White House web site: www.whitehouse.gov]
- "Information Design" Alert for Info Professionals
- RE: portable network graphics
Tuesday, 11 July 2000
- RE: Default fonts with style sheets and without
- Re: portable network graphics
- RE: portable network graphics
- RE: portable network graphics
- RE: portable network graphics
- Re: portable network graphics
- Re: portable network graphics
- portable network graphics
Sunday, 9 July 2000
Saturday, 8 July 2000
Friday, 7 July 2000
Thursday, 6 July 2000
Wednesday, 5 July 2000
Tuesday, 4 July 2000
- [media] RATED XHTML
- Re: Press Release on Barrier to Participation in the Digital Economy Raised by New Digital Signature Law
Friday, 3 January 1997
Monday, 3 July 2000
- Press Release on Barrier to Participation in the Digital Economy Raised by New Digital Signature Law
- Times survey on .com companies
- Re: The Times survey on .com companies
- The Times survey on .com companies
Sunday, 2 July 2000
- RE: Radio buttons id's and labels
- RE: bobby approved?
- RE: Radio buttons id's and labels
- Default fonts with style sheets and without