W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: reading vs. writing

From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2000 12:08:09 -0400
Message-ID: <39B125E9.1C889586@clark.net>
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, jonathan chetwynd <jc@signbrowser.org.uk>
this was somewhat my point but when reading media, we usually refer to
it as assimilation of text? To put it another way, how can an animation
be read aloud?  you can describe it outloud, but that is not the same as
a one to one correspondence as with text.  I do not miss the point here
though that strides towards higher comprehention and interaction are
being made.

-- 
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
ftp://poehlman.clark.net
http://poehlman.clark.net
mailto:poehlman@clark.net
voice 301-949-7599
end sig.
Received on Saturday, 2 September 2000 12:06:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:49 GMT