W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 13:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
cc: WAI IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009281355080.29106-100000@tux.w3.org>
Well, if it happened in two years I would be pretty satisfied I think.

For mainstream systems it is available - there are plugins and browsers
available for all operating systems, and a project here working on a
text-only SVG browser. (The source for news is the Working group page -
http:www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG - which includes links to many implementations
and implementation projects, though probably not all of them.)

But predicting the uptake of technology is difficult...

Charles

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Kynn Bartlett wrote:

  At 02:45 AM 9/28/2000 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  >Well, SVG does provide a solution, and is implemented in a number of systems
  >and operating systems already (plus it can be read as "generic XML" - text
  >with a stylesheet).
  >But for general use it is probably still a little while before it is used
  >widely enough to be considered a solution.
  
  By "a little while" you probably mean "two or three years"?
  
  Just checking. :)
  
  --Kynn
  
  
  

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
September - November 2000: 
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2000 13:59:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:50 GMT