www-tag@w3.org from January 2003 by date

Saturday, 1 February 2003

• Re: Valid representations, canonical representations, and what the SW needs from the Web... Sandro Hawke
• Re: Valid representations, canonical representations, and what the SW needs from the Web... Walden Mathews
• Re: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 31 January 2003

• Re: RDDL and XML Schema instances are not valid representations of namespaces Still, Erik R
• Re: Valid representations, canonical representations, and what the SW needs from the Web... Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Martin Gudgin
• Re: Valid representations, canonical representations, and what the SW needs from the Web... Sandro Hawke
• Re: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Valid representations, canonical representations, and what th e SW needs from the Web... Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Valid representations, canonical representations, and what the SW needs from the Web... Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Valid representations, canonical representations, and what th e SW needs from the Web... Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Valid representations, canonical representations, and what the SW needs from the Web... Sandro Hawke
• Re: [xmlProfiles-29] TAG recommendation for work on subset of XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Valid representations, canonical representations, and what the SW needs from the Web... Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: [xmlProfiles-29] TAG recommendation for work on subset of XML 1.1 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 30 January 2003

• TAG election results Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Temporally extended sessions Paul Prescod
• [xmlProfiles-29] TAG recommendation for work on subset of XML 1.1 Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Simon St.Laurent
• Raise new Issue 32?: ID attribute determination in new work on XML Version David Orchard
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Martin Duerst
• Re: RDDL and XML Schema instances are not valid representations of namespaces Sandro Hawke
• [Agenda] 3 Feb 2003 TAG teleconference (short welcome) Ian B. Jacobs
• RDDL and XML Schema instances are not valid representations of namespaces Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: [Minutes] 27 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, arch doc, IRIEverywhere-27, binaryXML-30, xmlProfiles-29) Norman Walsh
• RE: [forwarding] Topic Maps paradigm makes URI signification str aightforward Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [forwarding] Topic Maps paradigm makes URI signification straightforward Eric Miller

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Tim Bray
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Jos De_Roo
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Paul Grosso
• [Agenda] 6-7 Feb ftf meeting Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Does a URI identify a "web page"? Bernard Vatant
• Apologies -- Re: When to use HTTP Mike Champion
• Re: Does a URI identify a "web page"? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: KR, meet WWW. was: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Does a URI identify a "web page"? Tim Berners-Lee
• [offlist] Re: When to use HTTP Mike Champion
• Re: When to use HTTP Dan Connolly
• Re: When to use HTTP Mark Baker
• Re: When to use HTTP Mike Champion

Monday, 27 January 2003

• Re: There can be only one Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Tim Berners-Lee

Tuesday, 28 January 2003

• Re: When to use HTTP Dan Connolly
• RE: Temporally extended sessions Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Temporally extended sessions Tim Bray
• Temporally extended sessions Paul Prescod
• RE: Does a URI identify a "web page"? Micah Dubinko
• When to use HTTP Mark Baker
• [Minutes] 27 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, arch doc, IRIEverywhere-27, binaryXML-30, xmlProfiles-29) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: draft: Useful Theories about URIs Sandro Hawke
• Re: draft: Useful Theories about URIs Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 27 January 2003

• Re: Does a URI identify a "web page"? Tim Bray
• draft: Useful Theories about URIs Sandro Hawke
• RE: Does a URI identify a "web page"? David Orchard
• Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible Joseph Reagle
• Re: On subsetting XML... noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many David Booth
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) David Booth
• Re: Does a URI identify a "web page"? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) David Booth

Sunday, 26 January 2003

• Re: An XLink telco issues roundup arguing for XLink remapping Tim Bray
• What is a URI? Svgdeveloper@aol.com

Saturday, 25 January 2003

• RE: Does a URI identify a "web page"? Bernard Vatant
• Re: KR, meet WWW. was: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Jos De_Roo
• Does a http URI identify a "web page"? Tim Bray

Thursday, 1 January 1970

• Does a URI identify a "web page"? Tim Bray

Saturday, 25 January 2003

• Re: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many Jonathan Borden
• Re: There can be only one Jonathan Borden
• There can be only one Bill de hÓra
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: KR, meet WWW. was: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: KR, meet WWW. was: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Jonathan Borden
• Re: KR, meet WWW. was: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Jonathan Borden

Friday, 24 January 2003

• RE: on "How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers" Biron,Paul V
• Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Tim Bray
• RE: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Biron,Paul V
• RE: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many David Orchard
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Dan Connolly
• RE: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Larry Masinter
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Roy T. Fielding
• Re: KR, meet WWW. was: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Jos De_Roo
• Re: An XLink telco issues roundup arguing for XLink remapping Paul Grosso
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Dan Connolly
• An XLink telco issues roundup arguing for XLink remapping Lloyd Rutledge
• KR, meet WWW. was: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Jan Algermissen
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Miles Sabin
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Mark Baker
• RE: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Larry Masinter
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• Re: rationalizing identifier [was Re: Rationalizing the term URI] Larry Masinter
• Semantic Web Requirements (for URIs) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Larry Masinter
• Re: How do you POST to a "document"? Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF & fragment ids; what breaks? Mark Baker
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF & fragment ids; what breaks? Jonathan Borden
• Re: RDF & fragment ids; what breaks? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Jonathan Borden
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) David Booth
• Re: How do you POST to a "document"? Miles Sabin
• Re: How do you POST to a "document"? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: How do you POST to a "document"? Miles Sabin
• RE: Rationalizing the term URI Dare Obasanjo

Thursday, 23 January 2003

• Re: How do you POST to a "document"? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Jan Algermissen
• Re: Ontologies of the Web Miles Sabin
• Ontologies of the Web Sandro Hawke
• Re: Less is more (WAS: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL)) Sandro Hawke
• rationalizing identifier [was Re: Rationalizing the term URI] John A. Kunze
• Re: How do you POST to a "document"? Miles Sabin
• How do you POST to a "document"? Sandro Hawke
• RE: Rationalizing the term URI Williams, Stuart
• Re: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many Bill de hÓra
• Less is more (WAS: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL)) Miles Sabin
• RE: argument from authority considered pointless Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [Agenda] 27 Jan 2003 TAG teleconference (arch doc, URIs, IRIs) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Rationalizing the term URI Norman Walsh
• RE: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Reso urces is many to many Williams, Stuart
• Re: TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many Tim Bray
• Re: RDF & fragment ids; what breaks? Miles Sabin
• RE: Rationalizing the term URI Julian Reschke
• Re: RDF & fragment ids; what breaks? Mark Baker
• Rationalizing the term URI Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Bill de hÓra
• TAG request: establish the relationship between URIs and Resources is many to many Bill de hÓra
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Miles Sabin
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Miles Sabin
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Graham Klyne
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Graham Klyne
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Bill de hÓra
• RE: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (What Part of 'Resource' Don't I Understand?) David Booth
• Re: RDF & fragment ids; what breaks? Miles Sabin
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Miles Sabin
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Jonathan Borden
• Re: Please keep it clean Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: RDDL proposal from Sandro Hawke Jonathan Borden
• Please keep it clean Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Berners-Lee
• RDF & fragment ids; what breaks? Mark Baker
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Tim Bray
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Miles Sabin

Wednesday, 22 January 2003

• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Simon St.Laurent
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Simon St.Laurent
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Tim Bray
• RE: argument from authority considered pointless Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Miles Sabin
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Roy T. Fielding
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Roy T. Fielding
• RE: argument from authority considered pointless Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [Minutes] 20 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, Comparing URIs) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Simon St.Laurent
• Re: On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Norman Walsh
• Re: argument from authority considered pointless Jeff Bone
• argument from authority considered pointless Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Rick Jelliffe
• [Minutes] 16 Jan 2003 Linking in XML documents Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• RE: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• RE: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Michael Mealling
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Michael Mealling

Tuesday, 21 January 2003

• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Miles Sabin
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Bray
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) David Booth
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) David Booth
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Miles Sabin
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Bray
• RE: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Bray
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Michael Mealling
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Miles Sabin
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Michael Mealling
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Michael Mealling
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Tim Bray
• Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) Dan Connolly
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Tim Bray
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Steven Pemberton
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Robin Berjon
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Steven Pemberton
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Steven Pemberton
• [Minutes] 20 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, Comparing URIs) Ian B. Jacobs
• Which media type is used for interpreting fragment identifiers? Murata Makoto
• Re: The Web Services Architecture WG position on XML profiling/subset ting noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of a URL) David Booth

Monday, 20 January 2003

• Re: On subsetting XML... Jean-Jacques Moreau

Sunday, 19 January 2003

• Re: The Web Services Architecture WG position on XML profiling/subset ting Michael Rys

Saturday, 18 January 2003

• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) james anderson
• Re: On subsetting XML... Gavin Thomas Nicol

Friday, 17 January 2003

• RE: On subsetting XML... Dare Obasanjo
• Re: On subsetting XML... Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RDDL proposal from Garret Wilson Garret Wilson
• RE: On subsetting XML... Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• Re: On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• Re: On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• Re: On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• RE: On subsetting XML... Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: The Web Services Architecture WG position on XML profiling/subset ting noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• Re: The Web Services Architecture WG position on XML profiling/subsetting Paul Grosso
• Re: On subsetting XML... Elliotte Rusty Harold
• The Web Services Architecture WG position on XML profiling/subset ting Champion, Mike
• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Mark Nottingham
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Murata Makoto
• Re: On subsetting XML... Chris Lilley
• Re: On subsetting XML... noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Jonathan Marsh
• Fwd: RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 16 January 2003

• Re: On subsetting XML... Paul Grosso
• Re: On subsetting XML... Tim Bray
• Re: On subsetting XML... noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• [Agenda] 20 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (arch doc, findings, xlinkScope-23) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: On subsetting XML... Tim Bray
• Re: On subsetting XML... Paul Grosso
• Re: On subsetting XML... noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Jeremy Dunck
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Rick Jelliffe
• Re: On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• Re: On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• Re: On subsetting XML... Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: On subsetting XML... Jean-Jacques Moreau
• linkbase brainstorming [xlinkScope-23] Simon St.Laurent
• Re: On subsetting XML... Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Mark Nottingham
• Re: OASIS XRI - the next generation of resource identifiers <?> Larry Masinter
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Larry Masinter
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Robin Berjon

Wednesday, 15 January 2003

• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Roy T. Fielding
• RE: On subsetting XML... David Orchard
• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Mark Nottingham
• On subsetting XML... Norman Walsh
• Re: Why URIs in RDF? Sandro Hawke
• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Tim Bray
• RE: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: URI/URI ref distinction (was on "How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers") Simon St.Laurent
• Re: URI/URI ref distinction (was on "How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers") Graham Klyne
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Graham Klyne
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Sandro Hawke
• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Sandro Hawke
• RE: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Bill de hÓra
• Re: URI/URI ref distinction (was on "How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers") Simon St.Laurent
• RE: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Why URIs in RDF? Graham Klyne
• Re: URI/URI ref distinction (was on "How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers") Graham Klyne
• Re: Why URIs in RDF? Jan Algermissen
• RE: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Why URIs in RDF? Sandro Hawke
• RE: URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) Dare Obasanjo
• URI Opacity Principle (was: Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Sandro Hawke
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Roy T. Fielding
• RE: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Dare Obasanjo
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Sandro Hawke
• RE: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Joshua Allen
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Roy T. Fielding
• Re: yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Sandro Hawke
• yet another sidetrack on what a URI identifies Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

• Re: use of fragments as names is irresponsible Sandro Hawke
• use of fragments as names is irresponsible Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Worth reading, on URIs, services, semweb, etc Bullard, Claude L (Len)

Thursday, 2 January 2003

• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Rick Jelliffe
• Worth reading, on URIs, services, semweb, etc Tim Bray
• RE: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Dan Connolly
• URI/URI ref distinction (was on "How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers") Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: on "How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers" Williams, Stuart
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk

Monday, 13 January 2003

• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Rick Jelliffe

Tuesday, 14 January 2003

• RE: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Paul Cotton

Monday, 13 January 2003

• [Minutes] 13 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (XInclude issue, xmlProfiles-29, namespaceDocument-8, binaryXML-30) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Micah Dubinko
• on "How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers" Dan Connolly
• Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Tim Bray
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Micah Dubinko
• RE: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Paul Cotton
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Williams, Stuart

Sunday, 12 January 2003

• MIME thresholds (was Re: Options for dealing with IDs) Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Paul Grosso

Saturday, 11 January 2003

• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Tim Bray
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Paul Grosso
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Elliotte Rusty Harold

Friday, 10 January 2003

• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Norman Walsh
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Summary of TAG activity from 4 Dec 2002 to 10 Jan 2003 Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs David Orchard
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Robin Berjon
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Norman Walsh
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Dave Beckett
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Jeni Tennison
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Norman Walsh
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Paul Grosso
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: OASIS XRI - the next generation of resource identifiers <?> Norman Walsh
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Jeni Tennison
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Jeni Tennison
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs (RDF) Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• RE: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: [Agenda] 13 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (xmlProfiles-29, IRIEveryw here-27, more) Williams, Stuart
• Re: content negotiation anti-principle Gavin Thomas Nicol

Thursday, 9 January 2003

• Re: [Agenda] 13 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (xmlProfiles-29, IRIEverywhere-27, more) Norman Walsh
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Tim Bray
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Tim Bray
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: content negotiation anti-principle Jeremy Dunck
• Re: OASIS XRI - the next generation of resource identifiers <?> Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [Agenda] 13 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (xmlProfiles-29, IRIEverywhere-27, more) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs (RDF) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Jeremy Dunck
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Jeremy Dunck
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Jeremy Dunck
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Dave Beckett
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Robin Berjon
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 8 January 2003

• Re: content negotiation anti-principle Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Gavin Thomas Nicol

Thursday, 9 January 2003

• OASIS XRI - the next generation of resource identifiers <?> Tim Bray

Wednesday, 8 January 2003

• Re: content negotiation anti-principle Jeremy Dunck
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Jeremy Dunck
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: content negotiation anti-principle Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Robin Berjon
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Robin Berjon
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Brian McBride
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Simon St.Laurent
• Value of content negotiation? [was RE: content negotiation anti-principle] Jeremy Dunck

Tuesday, 7 January 2003

• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs David Orchard
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Paul Grosso
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs David Orchard
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Paul Grosso
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Options for dealing with IDs David Orchard
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Paul Grosso
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Paul Prescod
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Norman Walsh
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Tim Bray
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Tim Bray
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Norman Walsh
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Options for dealing with IDs Tim Bray
• Options for dealing with IDs Chris Lilley
• Re: [Minutes] 6 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, XInclude conneg, XML next version, namespaceDocument-8) Paul Grosso
• Re: [Minutes] 6 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, XInclude conneg, XML next version, namespaceDocument-8) Chris Lilley
• [Minutes] 6 Jan 2003 TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, XInclude conneg, XML next version, namespaceDocument-8) Ian B. Jacobs

Monday, 6 January 2003

• RE: SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal Micah Dubinko
• RE: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Williams, Stuart

Sunday, 5 January 2003

• RE: content negotiation anti-principle Simon St.Laurent
• RE: content negotiation anti-principle Julian Reschke
• Re: content negotiation anti-principle Elliotte Rusty Harold

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• Re: content negotiation anti-principle Gavin Thomas Nicol

Saturday, 4 January 2003

• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDDL proposal from Sandro Hawke Tim Bray
• Re: RDDL proposal from Sandro Hawke Sandro Hawke
• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

Friday, 3 January 2003

• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Jonathan Marsh
• Re: SemWeb use case for issue httpRange-14 Tim Bray
• Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Tim Bray
• Re: RDDL proposal from Sandro Hawke Tim Bray
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Tim Bray
• Re: norm's RDDL action item Tim Bray
• norm's RDDL action item Norman Walsh
• [Agenda] 6 Jan 2003 TAG Telconf Williams, Stuart

Thursday, 2 January 2003

• Re: SemWeb use case for issue httpRange-14 Miles Sabin
• Re: SemWeb use case for issue httpRange-14 Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 1 January 2003

• Re: SemWeb use case for issue httpRange-14 Roy T. Fielding

Last message date: Friday, 31 January 2003 22:00:04 UTC