Re: draft: Useful Theories about URIs

> On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 01:32  PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > Comments welcome, of course.  I suggest keeping them off this list but
> > please do cc: www-archive@w3.org so I can quote you.  I know, I'm
> > walking a time-intensive line between a paper and a wiki, but it's the
> > best I could come up with so far.
> >
> > [1]  http://www.w3.org/2003/01/web/
> 
> There are few things in life that will piss me off more than quoting me 
> as
> 
>   "[T]he definition of resource is vague.... The definition is in 2396" 
> ...
> 
> when what I actually said, as seen in the linked archive, is
> 
>   "The results will be ambiguous otherwise, and its not the other
>    system's fault, and its not because the definition of resource
>    is vague or tied to any one model.  The definition is in 2396" ...
> 
> which is the opposite of what Sandro implies I said.

I'm so sorry; that was really stupid mistake.  I added that at the
last minute because it caugh my eye, without paying enough attention.
Fortunately it was on a web page, not in archived e-mail, and was only
there for a few hours.
 
   -- sandro

Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 20:00:14 UTC