- From: Murata Makoto <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: 17 Jan 2003 13:55:01 +0900
- To: jmarsh@microsoft.com
- Cc: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org, eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp
>The XML Core WG has resolved the remaining issues you raise as indicated >below. If you disagree with these resolutions, please respond promptly >so we can present the issues as unresolved in our request for PR I agree with the resolutions for (2) and (3), but disagree with the resolutions for (1) and (4). >>1) XInclude ignores the media type (and probably the charset > parameter) associated with resources I see a conflict between XInclude and the WWW architecture and ask the TAG and Director to consider this issue. >> 4) XInclude blesses XPointer as fragment identifiers of text/xml, >> while RFC 3023 (XML media types) does not. > >The XML Core WG does not feel holding up XInclude for this purpose is >warranted, as there are no candidates for XPointer fragment syntax at >this time other than the XPointer features we have identified in the >spec. I certainly disagree with this decision, which ignores IETF. Cheers, Makoto
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 23:55:06 UTC