W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Options for dealing with IDs

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:28:50 -0600
Message-ID: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACDD8@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@textuality.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org

Someone please explain why this isn't a realistic 
option given an on-demand scenario.  If the DTD/Schema 
were ALWAYS processed, I agree that is a bad thing.
The one thing that jumps out at me is that requiring 
a DTD or Schema just to get at ID declarations is 
a heavy requirement given that the number of 
applications that use IDs is large, so this 
can in fact, become a virtual requirement to 
always get the DTD/Schema.

Is that it? 


From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com]

Isn't this a variation of #1?  I.e. it requires that interoperable 
processing requires fetching and looking in a DTD.  So probably not 
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2003 13:29:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:56 UTC