- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:28:50 -0600
- To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@textuality.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Someone please explain why this isn't a realistic option given an on-demand scenario. If the DTD/Schema were ALWAYS processed, I agree that is a bad thing. The one thing that jumps out at me is that requiring a DTD or Schema just to get at ID declarations is a heavy requirement given that the number of applications that use IDs is large, so this can in fact, become a virtual requirement to always get the DTD/Schema. Is that it? len From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com] Isn't this a variation of #1? I.e. it requires that interoperable processing requires fetching and looking in a DTD. So probably not realistic.
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2003 13:29:34 UTC